Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Anything to do with minesweeper...
babz
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by babz »

Just got a new 3bv/s record on intermediate
3.76 >> 3.96
I could have cracked the 4 barrier...

/me int game --> RTime: 22,68 (23) «» Est RTime: 22,68 (23) «» 3BV: 90/90 «» 3BV/s: 3,96 «» Cl: 144@6,35 «» IOE: 0,625 «» ThrP: 0,928 «» Corr: 0,674 «» Flags: 0 «» Ranks: 352/1 of 723 / 75,73% -.-

http://www.minesweeper.info/videoindex. ... londot.avf
Quate
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: California

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Quate »

/me int game --> RTime: 27.15 (28) «» Est RTime: 27.15 (28) «» 3BV: 37/37 «» 3BV/s: 1.36 «» ZiNi: 30@1.10 «» H.ZiNi: 33@1.22 «» Ops: 6/6 «» Isls: 12 «» Cl: 102@3.76 «» IOE: 0.363 «» Flags: 10 «» Ranks: 1/121 of 152 / 60.53%

Cracked my 30 with a 28! Best part is that I used ten flags and maintained a not-completely-disgusting 3BV on such an easy board. Rest of the stats are bad though.

(yes I'm bad at minesweeper, I'll get better)
Best Times: 1.25-17.99-71.03 = 90.27!
NF Times: 1.25-24.27-114.26 = 139.78

Best 3BV/s: 4.604-3.051-2.349 = 10.004!
NF 3BV/s: 3.232-2.424-1.392 = 7.048
User avatar
Tommy
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Vienna

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Tommy »

A couple of minutes after this, I got this:
int907.png
int907.png (14.94 KiB) Viewed 27725 times
9.07 rt on a beautiful 33 3bv board - most of it opened right at the start, just look at the opening...
Attachments
int_9078_FL_1334961836.rmv
(15.87 KiB) Downloaded 612 times
Don't anthropomorphize computers - they don't like it.
Quate
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: California

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Quate »

Guys. Holy crap. I shattered the 20 barrier. My previous best was 27.15. I don't even know.

/me int game --> RTime: 19.53 (20) «» Est RTime: 19.53 (20) «» 3BV: 33/33 «» 3BV/s: 1.68 «» ZiNi: 31@1.59 «» H.ZiNi: 32@1.64 «» Ops: 3/3 «» Isls: 8 «» Cl: 70@3.58 «» IOE: 0.471 «» Flags: 4 «» Ranks: 1/56 of 173 / 84.10%
Attachments
ScreenShot_0002.jpg
ScreenShot_0002.jpg (120.88 KiB) Viewed 27707 times
Best Times: 1.25-17.99-71.03 = 90.27!
NF Times: 1.25-24.27-114.26 = 139.78

Best 3BV/s: 4.604-3.051-2.349 = 10.004!
NF 3BV/s: 3.232-2.424-1.392 = 7.048
babz
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by babz »

Congrats tommy, almost a sub10!
EWQMinesweeper
Posts: 419
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by EWQMinesweeper »

/me custom game --> Time: 134,20 «» Est Time: 134,20 «» 3BV: 242/242 «» 3BV/s: 1,82 «» ZiNi: 159@1,19 «» Human ZiNi: 191@1,43 «» Openings: 8/8 «» Islands: 8 «» CL: 314@2,36 «» IOE: 0,77 «» ThroughPut: 0,85 «» Correctness: 0,90 «» Flags: 133 «» Ranks: 1/1 of 0 / 0% o_~ (cheat mode)

exp with 135 mines. 26+30+80+135+200 now
„Das perlt jetzt aber richtig über, ma sagn. Mach ma' noch'n Bier! Wie heißt das? Biddä! Bidddää! Biddddäää! Reiner Weltladen!“
User avatar
Tommy
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Vienna

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Tommy »

Dafuq Quate, that is a pretty epic jump :D Now improve your exp! That int is good enough for the world ranking ;)
Don't anthropomorphize computers - they don't like it.
Quate
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: California

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Quate »

Ahah thanks. Up until yesterday I mainly played int, since I believed it was more fun. (Generally I played about 2 hours of int and 1 hour of expert). But now I'm pretty much not gonna play int again until I get a sub90 on exp. Thanks!
Best Times: 1.25-17.99-71.03 = 90.27!
NF Times: 1.25-24.27-114.26 = 139.78

Best 3BV/s: 4.604-3.051-2.349 = 10.004!
NF 3BV/s: 3.232-2.424-1.392 = 7.048
qqwref
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by qqwref »

29 NF sub50s :D That means I have more than Konstantin.

Totals: 45x1, 46x5, 47x6, 48x5, 49x12.
NF player. Best scores 1-10-39.
NYMIKE
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 3:51 am

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by NYMIKE »

Previous best 3.14
/me int game --> RTime: 33.28 (34) «» Est RTime: 33.28 (34) «» 3BV: 107/107 «» 3BV/s: 3.21 «» ZiNi: 60@1.80 «» H.ZiNi: 67@2.01 «» Ops: 6/6 «» Isls: 4 «» Cl: 165@4.96 «» IOE: 0.648 «» Flags: 36 «» Ranks: 510/1 of 671 / 62.07%
qqwref
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by qqwref »

This is a bit of a silly achievement, but I now have a (NF) sub50 on all four official clones :p
44.98 on vienna, 45.55 on msx (today), 45.90 on arb, 47.39 on clone (just now).
NF player. Best scores 1-10-39.
qqwref
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by qqwref »

MMO-Minesweeper WR: 113,126 squares claimed; 99,475 squares cleared.

More details here.
NF player. Best scores 1-10-39.
qqwref
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by qqwref »

44.98 -> 44.88 :p

Not a particularly amazing game, 125 3BV (12 openings though) and only 3.8 cl/s, but a record is a record.

http://www.minesweeper.info/videoindex. ... 203BVs.avf
NF player. Best scores 1-10-39.
babz
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by babz »

5.30 >> 5.40

/me beg game --> RTime: 2,22 (3) «» Est RTime: 2,22 (3) «» 3BV: 12/12 «» 3BV/s: 5,40 «» Cl: 16@7,21 «» IOE: 0,750 «» ThrP: 1,000 «» Corr: 0,750 «» Flags: 0 «» Ranks: 50/1 of 2678 / 99,09%

few month i have not played except from density.
User avatar
Tjips
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:15 am
Location: South Africa

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Tjips »

Just nabbed a zini/s and hzini/s record :D
temp.png
temp.png (45.4 KiB) Viewed 27375 times
The number of minesweeper boards:
Exp: 140055249834355336357264746443955277014822625680974475320364702381803619892657792049596418323789908370400 (1.4e104)
Int: 13115156192346373485000211099954895788134532256 (1.3e46) &
Beg: 18934455246 (1.9e10)
:D
Quate
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: California

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Quate »

Finally beat my 2.5-month standing 19.53 with a 19.13! Feels good, and it's slightly quicker as well - a .2 3bvs improvement. Hooray.
Attachments
ScreenShot_0006.jpg
ScreenShot_0006.jpg (118.36 KiB) Viewed 27323 times
HI-SCORE Int_19.13_3BV=36_3BVs=1.88_Matt Kempster.avf
(12.06 KiB) Downloaded 600 times
Best Times: 1.25-17.99-71.03 = 90.27!
NF Times: 1.25-24.27-114.26 = 139.78

Best 3BV/s: 4.604-3.051-2.349 = 10.004!
NF 3BV/s: 3.232-2.424-1.392 = 7.048
qqwref
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by qqwref »

Very nice! And look at how few flags you have - you should join the NF dark side :twisted:
NF player. Best scores 1-10-39.
Quate
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: California

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Quate »

qqwref wrote:Very nice! And look at how few flags you have - you should join the NF dark side :twisted:
Heh, thanks. I'm actually rather good at NF compared to most flaggers (check my signature), so I think I'll stick with both. I neglect NF a little though, so you're right in that I should play it more. :mrgreen:
Best Times: 1.25-17.99-71.03 = 90.27!
NF Times: 1.25-24.27-114.26 = 139.78

Best 3BV/s: 4.604-3.051-2.349 = 10.004!
NF 3BV/s: 3.232-2.424-1.392 = 7.048
Watson
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:39 am

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Watson »

Is there any record for the most number of mines on any size board cleared?

1000 mines on a 57x94 board: http://i.imgur.com/IJEiE.png
Not very hard, just takes patience. Wonder why it wouldn't let me make the board wider.
qqwref
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by qqwref »

I'm not sure what the record is, but I did complete a 100x110 board with 1719 mines (=Intermediate density) a while ago. I think I remember someone completing 100x100 with 2063 mines (=Expert density) but I can't find the proof right now.
NF player. Best scores 1-10-39.
Watson
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:39 am

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Watson »

How'd you get it that size? Must not have been on a regular computer monitor...
qqwref
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by qqwref »

I made my own version which used scroll bars to allow for boards bigger than your screen.
http://mzrg.com/js/mine/multi.html
It's not an official clone, but it's good enough for unofficial events like this.
NF player. Best scores 1-10-39.
Watson
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:39 am

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by Watson »

Nice. I tried using a projector but the old one I have only has 2048 x 1572 resolution so the biggest board I got on MSX was 100x80, and a new record would be too dense. Might try my college's nice new ones when I go back this fall.

I like all the control and game modes. Fun clone.
aradesh
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by aradesh »

Watson, most people aren't generally interested in completing the most mines, but rather the largest board of either intermediate or expert density. For example you could complete a 1000x1000 board if it had 999,999 mines quite easiy. Or similarly huge boards with very low density, could still dwarf the current record of most mines solved.
E.g. on a 112x94 board, expert density would require 2171.4 mines, so we round up to 2172 (that is, at least expert density, rounding down would give a board not quite as dense as expert), or intermediate density would require 1645 mines exactly.
wylx
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:02 am
Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts

Re: Sticky: The Personal Record Thread!

Post by wylx »

On that topic, I've always wondered what the optimally hardest percentage of mine density is, or if it varies across board sizes. Just to pick a nice number, I'll conjecture that it moves toward 1/sqrt2 as board sizes become larger. I don't see a need to limit ourselves to Intermediate and Expert densities, which are pretty arbitrary, and it'd be interesting to see, for example, the record for largest board on which 50% density is achieved.
Locked