Page 1 of 1

consider 1s beg games on 1 3BV as 1,999999s

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:07 pm
by EWQMinesweeper
when a sweeper gets a 1 3BV board and doesn't solve it with the 1st click but with the 2nd or 3rd click - still solves it in 1s - these games usually have very low decimals. i find it fair to cosider them as 1s games when it comes down to the integer score and to consider them as "almost 2,0s" when comparing the decimals.

the same should also go for instant win beg boards. why shouldn't they be considered as 1,99999s too?

Re: consider 1s beg games on 1 3BV as 1,999999s

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:45 pm
by RonnyDeWinter
Do you mean for the old 1 3BV scores in the ranking? Because new ones arent allowed anyway, right?

Re: consider 1s beg games on 1 3BV as 1,999999s

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:48 pm
by EWQMinesweeper
i thought they were still allowed. i mean 1 3BV boards in general

Re: consider 1s beg games on 1 3BV as 1,999999s

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:08 am
by thefinerminer
This topic was solved in 2011, see viewtopic.php?f=12&t=137 "Ban Lucky Beginner Games".