when a sweeper gets a 1 3BV board and doesn't solve it with the 1st click but with the 2nd or 3rd click - still solves it in 1s - these games usually have very low decimals. i find it fair to cosider them as 1s games when it comes down to the integer score and to consider them as "almost 2,0s" when comparing the decimals.
the same should also go for instant win beg boards. why shouldn't they be considered as 1,99999s too?
consider 1s beg games on 1 3BV as 1,999999s
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:50 pm
consider 1s beg games on 1 3BV as 1,999999s
„Das perlt jetzt aber richtig über, ma sagn. Mach ma' noch'n Bier! Wie heißt das? Biddä! Bidddää! Biddddäää! Reiner Weltladen!“
- RonnyDeWinter
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:11 am
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: consider 1s beg games on 1 3BV as 1,999999s
Do you mean for the old 1 3BV scores in the ranking? Because new ones arent allowed anyway, right?
-
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:50 pm
Re: consider 1s beg games on 1 3BV as 1,999999s
i thought they were still allowed. i mean 1 3BV boards in general
„Das perlt jetzt aber richtig über, ma sagn. Mach ma' noch'n Bier! Wie heißt das? Biddä! Bidddää! Biddddäää! Reiner Weltladen!“
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:33 pm
- Location: UK, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: consider 1s beg games on 1 3BV as 1,999999s
This topic was solved in 2011, see viewtopic.php?f=12&t=137 "Ban Lucky Beginner Games".