Er...... I was surprised that so many of you response to my post~ I think it is a good start, too.
And I have just got the reply to [name removed]from that one [name removed]argued with, still in English.
"after finishing reading his comments, i find that i did not get myself across completely so there were some misunderstanding. i will try agian to make myself clear to others. i discovered that when i saw EWQ responsed in a serious way to my joke of banning clone0.97 videos. that was only a joke and nothing more( i used to use "XD" as a sign of a joke but it failed to function this time......) and the way he responsed to a joke shows that he may be annoyed by my words. i apologize for that, i did not mean to do that.
in fact when i mentioned EWQ, i only disagree about his opinion that once you have a 1s game you can stop playing. that make sence only to players who only focus on records. but many of us are playing for fun and beg is still fun even after you get 1s. i find it obvious that if i play beg for records i will get bored soon but i still like to play beg because i find it fun. i do not play minesweeper for records so i do not like the idea of focusing on expert or intermediate since all levels share the same fun of minesweeper. so i think beginner-players will not change by the ranking rules because they enjoy the fun from playing beg but not enjoy the records. that is all i want to say about EWQ. i did not mean that there was bias on beg in the aspect of skill or something like that. EWQ used his right to express his opinion, and thanks to 7[me^.^--one7th] i just use my right to say that beg is always worth playing.
as for the weight ranking...... that sounds reasonable to me, and i think i did not express any opposite view in my previous word. but if anyone think i did, i apologize and i will work harder on English......
another main point is MO, his strength and luck. i mentioned him because though i know it for sure that his 10.53 was accepted but , there are people including kamil ( but not you, EWQ, i know it for sure too) still trying to deny it. and as far as i know, they hold this opinion because:
1-the board is too lucky;
2-MO is not good enough on exp;
and the aim of the rest part of my previous word only wants to convince them that:
1-the board is lucky, but the same luck as the boards on which they got BEG(i left this three letters out last time, my fault....i did not compare his beg to others' exp,just beg VS beg.) record, his quick-minded action is the main factor of high 3bvs;
2-despite his exp performance, he is one of world's best beg players. i know that AVG scores alone don't mean much, i mention them just as examples. the fact is that-- judging by record or AVG, time or 3bvs or rqp or the whole time to win 10En(n>2) begs, anyway you name it-- the one i mentioned before as my friend is at the top in china and in all aspects.
and he is an exception of "all levels matters". before i met him, i hold the same idea as you; however, after watching him playing, i have to change my mind. the contrast between his performance on beg and exp makes him just more unbelievalbe than MO! if you watch him play, i guarantee you will also admit that there CAN be little direct relationship between the performance on exp and on beg. so in comparison, i do not feel any strange about MO's performance. it seems impossible to you, but it CAN happen and it did happen.
BTW,i mentioned MO can beat most of you but not ALL of you. i do not know the answer if in comparison to [name removed]or kamil judging by fastest time for 10, 100, 1000 beginner since they are just beyond godlike holyshit( to clarify: i mean no offence.....just an expression in DotA.), i am longing for the result. however, i am sure that MO can be at least TOP10 in fastest time for 1000 and TOP5 in 10000 beginner and, my friend may win the fastest in 100000 beginner since MO is busy at working now...... their craziness is beyond my imagination......but they really treat beg in that way. if you see the way they play, you will understand what i said. they are "insane" in all aspects.
PS: the "click-on-purpose" rule 7 mentioned when we talking about "3bv-solved-on-purpose" rule refers to kamil's 50% clicks rule but not the 1-click rule.[My bad>_< I should have pointed it out.--one7th] i agree that "1 click on purpose" works well, but kamil's suggestion sounds unreasonable since it violates the efficiency principle as mentioned before.
MO talked to me in person too. He said he think little of record or ranking, and it was his honor to make kamil try to modify the rule again and again.( I don't know whether I got it right......)
BTW, it is my first time to use English as a lingua franca , first time to communicate with people with different culture backgroud outside classroom, and what is more, i am glad that i can share ideas with world best minesweepers.so much for the reply. i made every effort to express myself clearly. if anyone misunderstand or feel annoyed this time, i apologise in advance; but i can not spare any time to reply them because the final exam ..... so .... merry christmas and happy sweep ...."
And players from saolei.wang began to join this Forum because we did not find the access to register until this week>_< I believe that further communication can help narrrow the gap between two sites. The gap appeared when clone2007 could't run on the operating system of Chinese edition , no matter XP or VISTA or WIN7; Framework installed or not. I don't know the reason why it can't run on Chinese operating system only, but I believe that if we work together we can work out an adjust version of clone2007 which fit the Chinese operating system soon, and that is every player in China hope to see. Maybe I shouldn't talk too much about that since it is not related to the topic.
And..... merry christmas and happy sweep too~.~