Feel free to chat, make suggestions, or tell your scores!
You can also chat with us on mIRC - server irc.newnet.net, port 6667, channel #minesweeper
Viewing Page 8 of 27 (Total Entries: 2685) |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 12:50:55 PM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
Clone: 11,111 on 47 ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 11:00:53 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@Dennis: send your int nf 3bvs vid to damien, to put it in world records section @Manu: the same ![]() @Rodrigo: I have the idea for Clone: MSX version 1.0 has very good thing to choose 3bv what u want to play - few seconds and u can play. But on your clone it takes ages to it to find XX 3bv board. I think u should improve it ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 10:43:37 AM |
|
Name: |
Rodrigo |
Comments: |
Dear Clone user, I couldn't understand some things you wrote. Please send me an e-mail: minesweeperclone at yahoo.com |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 10:42:24 AM |
|
Name: |
i'm sorry for this spam |
Comments: |
3bv less than limit... P.S. **** bravenet! Their guestbook becomes uglier and uglier, requires last flash player version, slow as turtle, etc... Can we move to simple, hand-made guestbook? |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 10:37:11 AM |
|
Name: |
Clone user's last spam |
Comments: |
i meant boards with 3bv |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 10:34:04 AM |
|
Name: |
Clone user continued |
Comments: |
... as legal ? And when you import old history, these games are importing as legal too... |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 10:31:36 AM |
|
Name: |
Clone user |
Comments: |
@Rodrigo: " Although I'm starting to work on a new version of the Clone" ![]() ![]() 1) What language will you use for new Clone ? 2007 & especially 2006 were much slower than 0.97 and behaved oddly because of evil .net ... ![]() 2) *agreeing with Schu* Bring back top10 lists please! 3) i used to docked counters window and miss this feature in .net version, along with Evolution, Activity and Level Repartition graphs 4) i like Schu's idea about graphs for different modes: "make it so when you right-click on a board mode, it selects that and only that mode i.e., deselects the other modes" 5) there's a thing in .net version i can't understand: why it shows old videos which recorded on boards with 3bv |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 10:11:35 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@KAmil: No it's actually not from the hacked version. I've downloaded it from saolei and the header of the vid is perfectly normal. It doesn't matter anyway........26 3BV isn't allowed on minesweeper.info. |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 09:59:23 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@Damien: give a 10s vid on 26 to Rodrigo, Im 99% its also on this version ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 09:58:17 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@Manu: superzombie@op.pl ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 09:56:03 AM |
|
Name: |
damien |
Comments: |
Li Feng wrote me a few months ago about a Chinese player who hacked Clone0.97 so you could play UPK in legal mode. He asked me to tell Rodrigo (which I did). I don't have a copy of the hacked version. Li is one of the moderators on Zhang's website (saolei.net), so I was surprised the video is not on the site. I emailed him to ask if it was his record because the email only had the video and a '!' in it. I am waiting for his answer. Maybe he sent the video because I did not give him an answer about the cheater. |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 09:52:12 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Rodrigo: Ah ok, I'd wrongly assumed that Clone 2007 and 0.97 were the same version. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 08:45:39 AM |
|
Name: |
manuel h |
Comments: |
i judged after seeing the vid, and the vid looks valid, but as i said 1 minute before i noticed rodrigos postto rogen in irc: if someone finds a way to record regular videos of restricted 3bvboard and plays it the first time, it will always look fine -.- @ kamil, can u just add ur email for me on ur next post please? too lazy to search for it ;-) mfg manu |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 08:41:01 AM |
|
Name: |
Rodrigo |
Comments: |
@KAmil: just to make it clear, "funny mode" does not necessarily generates low 3BV boards. We don't know what "funny mode" does yet. Generating low 3BV boards was only an example that Ronny mentioned. @Gergely: I checked some of the first Chinese players in the world ranking and their videos are all ok. NOTE: nothing against China. ![]() ![]() @Ronny: Although I'm starting to work on a new version of the Clone, there is no need to worry. Li Feng was using a hacked 0.97 version, which is not the latest one. |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 08:19:10 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
Sorry for spamming but I have to say 2 more things: 1. 13->10 and 12->9 both by Chinese players. 2. about 1 year ago I posted that choosing 3bv limit should be accepted, because people wont have to waste time playing high 3bv boards. On this way, his 9 really is a 9, but "Funny mode" generates only low 3bv boards, so it cant be accpeted |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 08:07:16 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
I want to say some things: 1. If he downloaded Clone from the normal site, the version would be correct. He had to know that he plays on another version. 2. I dont see his record posted on Chinese ranking site. I also dont think that he always cheats. i think that he only wanted to do a joke to damien and us all - and if we believed to him, he would say that it was cheated. 3. DiegiVizia has 2 obviously cheated 2 beginner games in his videofolder. Rodrigo should check if its the same version. 4. 13-> 10 and 12->9 in 10 days time - check if that 10 wasnt made also on the same version. 5. The investigation should start with checking all top CHinese players vids' verion ![]() @Damien: I was only 0,03 too bad to beat Dion's int record, but u still can write in news ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 08:05:17 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Gergely: My vote would also be NO right now. What's even more alarming is that his old records were all on the official version (looking at the headers), so what's the chance of someone changing to a hacked version and immediatly breaking the world record with a huge improvement and it to be legit? We simply don't know what has been altered in this 'funny' version. For instance, maybe this hacked version only generates boards between 30-35 3BV.......well if it doesn't take much imagination to understand that a player capable of a 12 would get a 9 within a week if he played on a version like that and also his record would look 100% legit. ![]() This is really sad development, because now we might have to tie Rodrigo to his chair to make him create a new official Clone version, because 0.97 appears to be hacked. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 07:46:47 AM |
|
Name: |
Gergely |
Comments: |
p.s.: I don't think Li is a cheater, the clone he used might be the bogus one. In this case, it's sad that this record cannot be validated. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 07:43:08 AM |
|
Name: |
Gergely |
Comments: |
I'm sorry, but then I have to change my opinion to a definite NO ![]() There are some rules how a record could be made, and that consist that only on accepted versions can anyone achieve a record. This is not the case here. ![]() I hope however that his other records were made on accepted versions - Rodrigo, can you please check them? Thanks! ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 07:39:52 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Rodrigo: Wow! ![]() @Kamil: FL 5,2 -> 5,800 zOMG @@@@CHEATGOD@@@@! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 07:22:06 AM |
|
Name: |
Rodrigo |
Comments: |
Ok, guys, let me explain exactly why I said "It doesn't look very well to me": I first tried to change my regional settings to Chinese to watch that video. But Chinese language was not installed in my computer. So I decided to load the source code of the Clone on Visual Basic and "force" the opening of the vid (that's how I recorded the AVI). But first, I needed to know which version was used to record the vid, so I opened the MVF using notepad just to read the header of the file, which contains information about the version. Then I got a surprise. ![]() *Minesweeper Clone*2004-2008*Funny Mode By Abiu China*version 0.97 june And here is what I was supposed to find: *Minesweeper Clone*2004-2005*Rodrigo Silveira Camargo*version 0.97 beta Only by that, there is one thing I can say for sure: this guy used a hacked version of the Clone to record the vid. And if I can interpret correctly the pieces of string changed in the header, there are some things I can SUSPECT about: PROBABLY this "Abiu" guy from "China" hacked the Clone in "june" "2008" and inserted a "Funny Mode" in it. You know, that game mode thing (Classic/UPK/Density/Cheat). I CAN'T SAY Li Feng cheated, because I don't know how much modified this hacked version is. I don't know if the hacker modified it so much as to make cheating possible. I don't know if the hacker only made a harmless "joke" replacing strings, instead. I don't know. But Li Feng used a hacked version of the Clone to record his 9. This is for sure. If I had to say in a single word if this 9 should be accepted or not, it would be "no". But if I had to say it using more than one word, I would say "not for now, let's investigate it first". ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 07:03:25 AM |
|
Name: |
Charles (aka Knolan) |
Comments: |
Hello everyone ! Just a little "hello world" ![]() Congrats to all record breakers (manu & kamil ... you rocks !) I hope one of you will beat this f****g int sub10 barrier ![]() I've re-installed clone and play 1 hour per week ... so no records for me but who knows maybe I'll get out of retirement one day ![]() R-E-S-T-E-C-P to the sweepers ! ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 06:28:38 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Best intermediate: |
5,214 NF ->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5,800 FL |
Comments: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 05:52:15 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
it also seems to be 1st in world sub13 NF RQP: 12,126 ![]() @Manu: i win 5-15 int boards/ day ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 05:45:36 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@KAmil: That's the spirit......keep breaking those WR's. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 05:32:54 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Best expert: |
NF 3,727 -> 3,74 |
Comments: |
Arbiter: 166 in 45,34 ![]() ![]() btw, yesterday I made my 1st sup5 FL ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 03:57:47 AM |
|
Name: |
manuel |
Comments: |
the difference between kamil and flaggers like dion or me is, that we finish way more games than kamil ( like 150-350 on one day for me) , and higher 3bv (kamils avrg was sth like 57 ) . we r used to higher 3bv boards, because they do fit better to flagging style. on low 3bv boards we lose a lot of time by unnecassarily flagging .... in my normal style i get like 4,4-4,8 3bv/s in every 2nd game and often sup 5 ( got 13x sup5 in last 2 days, 2 times 2xsup5 in a row ;-) ) but when i force myself to play more with leftclick (like 5-8 flags /board) i get lots of low times ( like 6x11 in last 4 days) ... the real good times are nevertheless just a question of easy boards ;-) btw, got a 73/111 @ 6,3 yesterday and a 54/102 @ 7,xx and now cant play for the next 2 weeks ![]() mfg manu |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 03:18:15 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
I think Many puts it well. I believe with a huge amount luck that everyone capable of doing a 12 can theoretically also get a 9. In time we've seen more and more players getting 12s games or faster, so it was just a matter of time until a lucky ******* got such a 'baby board' as Manu calls it. Surely it's a bit unfair towards players like Dion, Manu, Kamil and Zang that would obviously require a less lucky board to get a 9, but that's just a fact: Minesweeper time records are unfair. (which is reason it's so addictive as well, because you will never be fully satisfied with your records) Luckily for KAmil this WR record is not a NF game, so he still owns the NF WR on intermediate and he can also still be the FIRST ever to get a 9 NF. Also looking strictly at the WR 3BVs records than Dion, not KAmil, should be more frustrated of not being the first to get a 9, since Dion owns the overall 3BVs WR. So with other words, Dion lost his chance of being the first getting a 9 on his specialty, while KAmil can still be the first in his specialty being: NF So good luck KAmil on your attempt to getting he first 9 NF. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 02:06:23 AM |
|
Name: |
manuel h |
Comments: |
@ gergely i think its close, but he hits that 1 .... imo it looks pretty valid , **** it ;-) it somehow satisfies me that kamil isnt the first haha ![]() ![]() ![]() and it proofs sth that was discussed when the 3bv limits were set: they r not neccesary because there are a lot sub30 3bv boards that are two times harder to solve than this baby board ![]() i once got a 23 3bv board, and it was harder to solve than this 32 board, so the 3bv limits dont exlcude the supereasy babyboards, they just makes them more rare and makes it harder to compete on lucky boards .... we need to limit the time jumps, only one second improvements schould count as worldrecord <-- LOL imo ms still needs no limitation... and not to forget : Grats li feng for being the first !! i now can concentrate on a goal that is more important for me: sup6 3bv/s ![]() mfg |
![]() |
|
Sep 8th 2008 at 01:23:44 AM |
|
Name: |
Gergely |
Comments: |
Hello, and congrats to Bertie! ![]() About Li's 9-sec video: I was only able to watch the .avi file due to limitations on this machine, and at first it looked a well-played very easy board (are you sure its 3bv is over 30??? ![]() ![]() And watching it for approximately the 1x th time, I found this little problem after the 3rd flag was placed: a double click, which does not reach the field it was intended to. It can be a problem of the camtasia though, and I would like to recall those who are able to watch the .mvf to verify the mouse movement and where that click was placed - but frame-by-frame I watched the .avi and the mouse doesn't seem to touch the "1". BUT once again, it might be the screen capture which caused this problem, as the mouse doesn't "flow" but jumps from frame to frame. I don't see any other problems with this possible world record video. ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 11:54:09 PM |
|
Name: |
shelley |
Comments: |
hey guys. come on. give this guy a break. he probly doesnt even understand most of what u guys said. I dont see anything wrong with the vid. it just seems to me that he lucked out on the map. i mean, the map does seem pretty easy and there's a big luck factor in minesweeper anywayz..for those of u who thinks he clicked too slowly...u guys r nuts. if he clicked any faster it would probably have been completed in 8seconds or sth..do u want the world record to be even faster?well,not me. and he clicked 4.90clicks per sec by the way. pretty fast to me. so peace outz!!! ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 11:49:41 PM |
|
Name: |
Dennis Lutken |
Comments: |
@Kamil: I would love to send my former int 3bv/s WR but I don't have your email address. If you want to send me an email, send it to dennislutken at yahoo dot com. |
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 09:04:19 PM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
Looks real to me, but for kamil anybody who is better than him is a cheater. Kamil you are still just a kid who will never be the best in the world remember. |
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 05:24:43 PM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Fritz & joni: Valid points indeed, although I prefer to see a longer vid of this guy (for instance 5-10 minutes using camtasia and his history file of Clone as backup) to really to be sure. He wouldn't even have to get a sub13 on that vid...just a little general game play of his, so was can see how good he is. |
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 04:00:46 PM |
|
Name: |
fritz |
Comments: |
@rodrigo: thx for putting up the vid @joni: i think my first 14 was ok, because i got that time in anger about getting my umpteenth 15 some minutes before that and so i played expecting a record @ronny: 1) marking the 1st flag is ok in my opinion. i'd say it is natural to mark the nearest useful mine. but what i find a bit strange is that between the (single!!!!!) initial click and the right click on the mine there seem to be no other "wasted clicks". if i remember kamils youtube vids correctly even he clicks at least 2 times before he aproaches the first patterns. maybe i'm a bit biased at this aspect because i usually do 2.5 - 3 circles with the mouse with ~3-5 clicks in each full circle to start an exp board.... 2) to me it seems that the timeloss is caused by him deciding whether he clicks on that square or not. he seems to know that this board was fast and therefore isn't sure if he wants to risk losing it. so that click gives the impression that he saw the board the 1st time when he got the 9, what speaks in favour of this being a new wr. 3) indeed the clicks around 2-3s feel a bit slow, but that doesn't say anything. eg. on squaro i get my best times when i focus on precise clicking and not on having insane speed... 4) what about manu's 15->11, oli's 45->39, my 56->51, bertie's 50->46, gergö's current best exp, lots of other players' 3sec and more int jumps?????? the only aspects that would speak against a valid 9 would be 1) a bit of 3) and the way he opens 4th opening @ 6s and the way he solves the patterns at8s (why didn't he mark only the last flag, the 2nd last costs much time) (thank you very much for mentioning me in between such great sweepers like manu or dion) all in all, a 9 on that board seems to be possible in 1st try to me so i blieve in this being a valid score. big grats to li feng on setting the new int wr and being the 1st to get sub10 in realtime 1 |
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 03:30:45 PM |
|
Name: |
joni |
Comments: |
Big grats to Bertie and Li Feng ![]() As pointed out, there's a lot of shaking on (Sir) Berties vid (I think i've seen the same bug in videos of Jan Parucka...) and I didn't manage to watch the Li Fengs original mvf file either (i can't seem to find the XP CD ![]() ![]() @Ronny: i'm yet to see an int time record from anyone that is pleasent on the eye... and that 3 in the corner is not a pattern... it is an unforced guess, albeit a gamble you have to take if you're going for a record, especially on int. btw, are there any realistic chances for you Bertie or any Chinese player to show up in Vienna? |
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 02:09:37 PM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Rodrigo: txs for the vid Well i watched it and it's a little contradicting: 1) I always find ''static'' starts of the mouse alarming. Especially when it very quickly followed by a 4 in 1 3BV flag that happens to be next to the starting point. It often is an indication of an UPK game. 2) The 3 in the left-corner somehow costs him a lot of time. This is weird, because if it would be an UPK game you would expect him to be quicker on it and if he's really capable of a 9 you would expect him to be quicker on it as well. I've never seen such a simply pattern take players like KAmil, Dion, Fritz or Manu that long. (No proof of proud off course, just strange) 3) Only his last few clicks felt like a speed that you would expect from a WR, the rest of the clicks didnt appear much faster than my own, while I never even got a sub 16s game. 4) Going from 12->9 is statistically 'unlikely' It most certainly wasn't the best ever player or game I've just watched. If it was the best time ever....I can't tell for sure. |
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 01:36:03 PM |
|
Name: |
Rodrigo |
Comments: |
I did it. The link is in the URL field below. It doesn't look very well to me also... ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 12:59:40 PM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
I cant watch it too, but of course a cheat ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 12:32:30 PM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
Can anyone record that 9,78 vid and save it as avi, because i dont have the disk space to install Asian languages. |
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 11:19:12 AM |
|
Name: |
damien |
Comments: |
Website Updated ![]() Biggest news is Bertie and his 46....but Li Feng (#2 in China) just sent me a video of a 09.78s on intermediate (3bv=32). Can you guys all watch it and let me know what you think? The video was made in China, so go to Control Panel --> Regional and Language Settings --> and change Format to 'China - Hong Kong' to watch. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 06:45:51 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@KAmil: Wow, it really seems like you somehow improved again over the last week, because that blast actually could have been a hops (time and 3BVs) on the WR, which I bet would have been the first WR hops ever. Hopses usually only occur when your time and 3BVs and time record are both outdated and will seen be broken. So have a little more patience......I wouldn't be surprised to see multiple WR's of you next month. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 7th 2008 at 05:31:29 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Best expert: |
NF 44 on 131 |
Comments: |
Clone: 131/159 est 42,3 NF @ 3,8, all openings opened, no guesses left ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 6th 2008 at 06:34:33 PM |
|
Name: |
Andrew Washburn |
Best expert: |
66 |
Best intermediate: |
17 |
Best beginner: |
1 |
Comments: |
Hey Damien and all! I used to be a real regular on this website, years ago, and had a reputation for raising hell on the message boards. I've moved on to bigger things and am now married and the father of two girls. Damien, honestly, I don't have any proof, but I do specifically remember that I have finally gotten the elusive 1 second beginner game. If you could find it in your heart to trust me and update my record, cool. If not, I suppose I could try to do it again and provide a screenshot. I'd understand, after all, I've been around long enough to remember that Joao fraud of 1999. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 6th 2008 at 06:13:42 PM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Fritz: Yep got that feeling as well. Also you can see that all boards, when not playing tournament, are numbered (0.100), so I guess it's just a fixed number of boards on tournament as well. |
![]() |
|
Sep 6th 2008 at 03:41:35 PM |
|
Name: |
fritz |
Comments: |
@ronny: nice! i improved my best in the squaro tournament by 1 more sec to 27s (8 13 6) now. today i also got one more 27 (9 8 10) and another 28 (7 13 8). with 3 easy boards in a row i think i could beat the 23s/1st place, atm every tournament is at least sub35 for me ![]() did someone else notice too that in the squaro tournaments exactly the same boards occur again every few minutes, i kinda started to memorize the first few easy boards...? |
![]() |
|
Sep 6th 2008 at 02:33:55 PM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
Broke the minute barrier on SquarO (57s, No.72)......still feel like a noob on that game, but at least it's almost 100 spots higher on the ranking as yesterday. ![]() @KAmil: Lol, with that speed you could get 7s on a 3BV=34 ![]() [ |
![]() |
|
Sep 6th 2008 at 12:29:57 PM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
CLone: 60/81 @ 5,711 NF, 50-50 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 06:37:28 PM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
Oh and i thought my 1:17 (170th) on squaro was good....you solve 3 when i solve 1. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 01:44:00 PM |
|
Name: |
fritz |
Comments: |
just got 28s in the squaro tournament, 5th place still 5s away from 1st place in squaro tho ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 01:20:40 PM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
sorry for spamming, but I have the last question: @Christoph: if in 1st session I win 2x5 on beg, and 13x5 n int, will I get max points for those levels in every next session? ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 01:05:16 PM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@Christoph: I have the question about Vienna sweeper: when timer shows for example XX,98, the file can be called XX,975 -XX,984. But when timer shows XX,00, vid is always called XX,000, wtf? ![]() And another question about point system: How long is the session? @Damien: Lukasz's profle is in country ranking, but not in world ranking ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 12:56:57 PM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
Clone: 47,345 FL on 171, my 1st sub13 RQP: 12,832 ![]() @Manu: ok, can u send it to damien to put in in world record section plz? ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 11:10:40 AM |
|
Name: |
Aris |
Comments: |
i havent played for 2 months because of holidays ![]() ![]() and of course grats to all record breakers and especially to bertie ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 11:08:55 AM |
|
Name: |
manuel |
Comments: |
hehe, im glad he is far away in australia ;-) got a new 2nd int 3bv/s : 5,531 and my beg 3bv/s on this pc : 6,951 ( i was playing like 10 beg boards -.-) btw kamil, u broke my int nf 3bv/s worldrecord ... mfg |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 09:12:02 AM |
|
Name: |
Michael |
Comments: |
I'm 36th in the squaro league with my left hand :) |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 08:24:08 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@Gergo: I win 1 board/2 hours ![]() @Manu: that blast was good for u: if u beat Dion's record, he would kill u, your family, fire your house, eat your food and rape your dog ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 05:35:31 AM |
|
Name: |
GergA? |
Comments: |
@Ronny: Sometimes I am quite good, sometimes I am happy if I finish 2-3 exp boards in 2 hours... Yesterday was a good day as I made two sub 20s. I guess I have 11-13 sub 20s. That 18,9xx was my 7. best and I have at least 4 19s. But it won't help me in Vienna. There I must finish so many exp games... |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 05:18:37 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@Dennis: can u send your int nf ex-world record 3bvs vid? i have the WR but never watched the vid of record what I have beaten ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 04:56:56 AM |
|
Name: |
manuel |
Comments: |
85/88 @ 5,744 3bv/s , lost on a guess :/ mfg |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 03:33:59 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Erik: 'Turned pro' simply means the date at which a player achieved a total sum of less than 100 seconds for beginner int expert combined. If you sum of these 3 types is less than 100s as well and you want to be in the world ranking, simply send your records to damienalexmoore at yahoo.com. With the following info: Name (first, last) Country (state or province) Scores Score dates Evidence (pics or videos) ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 03:28:24 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Gergo: Congrats, indeed a very nice game. Good to see you're still improving. (Although I'm also glad to see my NF IOS record (1.35344: 53 in 19.793) still beats yours by a nose length. ![]() @Kamil: A 10,3s with 7 openings, wow..........you're really getting very close now. It's no matter of luck now if you ever a good enough board to produce a 9, it's just a matter of time . ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 01:58:46 AM |
|
Name: |
Erik |
Comments: |
Hi! I have seen in some biography's that some has "turned pro" and I wonder what it means? ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 5th 2008 at 01:25:17 AM |
|
Name: |
Arsen |
Comments: |
Dennis, In World Ranking you press the link with an arrow sign near the player's name and get to his profile. You easily find "Videos" there. |
![]() |
|
Sep 4th 2008 at 11:33:54 PM |
|
Name: |
Dennis Lutken |
Comments: |
What's up with this thing? It can't even write my name anymore? Well, thank you Bravenet for the warm welcoming! ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 4th 2008 at 11:31:13 PM |
|
Name: |
Dennis Lütken |
Comments: |
Man, it's been such a long time since I visited this guestbook! I still recognize a few people though. Bertie, congrats on that 46. Simply amazing! Well done! ![]() Can anybody let me know once again how I find those video folders of people? I would like to check out some of Kamil's int games, since it sounds like he's got quite a few nice ones. And for those of you who are wondering... No, I am not back here to sweep for real, I am just playing a bit for fun and only on those weekly tournament custom boards, so thank you Fritz for getting me back to playing, even if only for a short while. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 4th 2008 at 11:09:44 PM |
|
Name: |
GergA? |
Comments: |
A wonderful record from yesterday! 18,931 on a 49 board int NF. IOS, IOE and RQP record in one! 7. best time, and: RQP: 6,928 (previous: 6,976) IOS: 1,34827 (prev: 1,33693) IOE: 0,845 (prev: 0,828) Video in my NF Intermediate folder ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 4th 2008 at 11:47:13 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Best intermediate: |
10x13 -> x14 |
Comments: |
Clone: 10,308 on 33, 7 openings. in my folder ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 4th 2008 at 08:33:11 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@ROnny: I played hour before lessons, and 1,5 hour after lessons, so its not 5 hours ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 4th 2008 at 05:10:39 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@KAmil: Very nice......but don't forget to eat, because I saw you online at hi-games 5 hours in a row ![]() Don't you have to the problem that it's hard to adjust to the 'open square on release (clone) and on press (hi-games) difference? I always blasted more games when I switched between does 2 version, because on Clone you can press before the cursor arrives at the square, while at higames you must wait till it arrived. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 4th 2008 at 04:49:09 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Best intermediate: |
NF 5,214 -> 5,272!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@@@ |
Comments: |
Hi-games.net: 65 3BV in 13,33 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 4th 2008 at 04:06:49 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@Ronny: its the easiest board what Ive ever seen to beat 3bv/s score ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 4th 2008 at 12:10:28 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@KAmil: Hehe very nice....replay looks almost inhuman lol. Off course it won't be an official WR, but still ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 11:34:39 PM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Best beginner: |
NF 6,90 -> 7,054 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@@@@@@@@@@@@ |
Comments: |
Hi-games.net: 17 3BV in 3,41 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 11:29:28 PM |
|
Name: |
GergA? |
Comments: |
Sir Bertie. Let me congratulate to you a lot. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 11:26:50 PM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@Bertie: very nice, I'll try y\to upk later ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 06:51:54 PM |
|
Name: |
WP |
Comments: |
Nice one, Bertie, congrats! :) |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 05:17:02 PM |
|
Name: |
Michael |
Comments: |
Very well done sir. |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 02:22:29 PM |
|
Name: |
fritz |
Comments: |
@"sir bertie": biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig grats. i'm so happy that you finally got sub50. gonna watch the video tomorrow. i wonder why you didn't address in the appropriate way to the rest of the sub50players so far ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 02:15:36 PM |
|
Name: |
Jon S |
Comments: |
Congrats to Bertie ![]() I bought some other computer games this weekend. Really stupid... They're screwing up my preparations for the WCH ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 02:04:00 PM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Bertie: Congrats, very nice. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 01:04:35 PM |
|
Name: |
Bertie (from now on to be adressed as 'sir') |
Best expert: |
46.81 on 124 @ 2.70 3bv/s, 0.77 IOE, 3.51 clicks/s |
Best intermediate: |
13 |
Best beginner: |
2 |
Comments: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I now officially become one of the elite!!! This record comes of two failed est records, a 3bv/s record and my first 14 on int (both in the last week). This time catapults me to no.24 on the ranking and makes me feel all warm inside. ![]() ![]() ![]() There is still however the little issue of my broken arbiter which is going to make KAmil wet himself when he sees the (jittery) vid. To combat this I took a whole lot of screenshots and am planning to take some video footage showing my screen (where I haven't even clicked the balloon away yet ![]() ![]() Vid is in my folder, if anyone has a clue as to what is wrong with my arbiter, let me know. (via email if you really want to) Today's a good day! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 12:19:17 PM |
|
Name: |
fritz |
Comments: |
@kamil: "dropout rules" ??????????????????? i never read about this term in any relation to minesweeper. if it has sth to do with minesweeper: can you or somebody else please explain what is meant by that???? @3BV limitations issue: can we please have a clear decision here, even if it was that there are different values of different rankings or that it is that boards from xx-yyy 3BV can in some cases be accepted. also i'd be interested in what were the arguments for the opportunities in that decision, because to me the only difference between 99 or 100 3BV seems to be that a few more boards are accepted or not. @manu: i got 7s on 5*5 easy during the 3 tournament games a few times so far. my best for the 3 5*5 tournament games is 31s, 6th place in the ranking ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 11:45:10 AM |
|
Name: |
Christoph |
Comments: |
Oh, and btw, that wasn't the question of the poll: we had one poll for each level and only expert was 4-3. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 11:41:30 AM |
|
Name: |
Christoph |
Comments: |
Actually Dan did post that he'd like to change his vote if the poll would allow it and that he would be also fine with 99. It's also not the case that I just accidently posted the result. True is, that I wrote in the IMC forum when and what I'd post two days in advance and asked the other members to complain if anything wasn't ok with it. As nobody reacted I made the post. Later on we discussed how to handle the case and concluded that the decison should stay as it was originally made 2-30-99 (Even Damien told me that he would be fine with that - but somewhen he made up his mind to use different rules for his ranking). |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 09:25:49 AM |
|
Name: |
manuel h |
Comments: |
got a new int 3bv/s highscore: Last game: 19.632sec - 3BV=105 - 3BV/s=5.635 - level=int *flagging* - Ranks: 10738/1 - IOE=1 - RQP=3.484 (btw, 5*5, easy :7s ) mfg manu |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 08:31:00 AM |
|
Name: |
fritz |
Comments: |
@bertie: "Besides, my time is better. 21s on 7*7 easy, and I have 46s on 7*7 hard. I'm obviously better!" i have 40s on the tournament, while you have 48s. ![]() btw. squaro is awesome |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 05:23:57 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@AreOut: sure, and i have 6,189 3BV/s on Int on 115 3bv but im also too lazy to find the vid ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 03:51:37 AM |
|
Name: |
damien |
Comments: |
Hi Kamil, the IMC created a poll and the result was 4-3 for 2-30-99 ... but the poll did not let you change your vote and (while the poll was still open) Dan posted that he wanted to change his vote. So the result was actually 4-3 for 2-30-100, but Christoph accidentally posted 2-30-99 in the Guestbook. (Dan's 44 was on a 99 3bv board, but he accepted a limit of 100 3bv if we didn't delete old scores. Later he tied his record on the Clone anyways). ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 01:05:13 AM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
kamil the best Ive found is 62 (61.47) on 251 on MSX which is 4.08 3bv/s but I'm sure I have better on clone and arbiter, just too lazy to find them. |
![]() |
|
Sep 3rd 2008 at 01:01:10 AM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@KAmil: 99 or 100.........what does it matter, if I recalled correctly you've never solved a sub120. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 2nd 2008 at 12:34:52 PM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
"The World Ranking uses 3BV limits of 2-30-100." I always thougth it 2-30-99 ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 2nd 2008 at 09:54:19 AM |
|
Name: |
fritz |
Comments: |
@johnny: at first: welcome to the minesweeper community, johnny you have to ask damien if you want a profile. but to have your scores on the ranking it is enough when you send him the video replays of your scores in an e-mail. on the linked website you can see how the rankings work. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sep 2nd 2008 at 08:43:13 AM |
|
Name: |
Johnny |
Comments: |
Hi, I'm new here and i Would like to create my profile an join comunity but I don't see any link for registration. Can somebody help me? |
![]() |
|
Sep 2nd 2008 at 05:23:00 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
hi guys, i dont really understand "Drop out rules" ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 2nd 2008 at 05:08:49 AM |
|
Name: |
t-4 |
Comments: |
why there are no videos or pictures of country scores? |
![]() |
|
Sep 2nd 2008 at 04:28:35 AM |
|
Name: |
KAmil |
Comments: |
@AreOut: if 41 on 166 is your time record, show me your 3bv/s record then ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 2nd 2008 at 12:41:18 AM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
I also think kamils 11 on 53 NF must be a cheat, just because it cant be real ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 1st 2008 at 01:12:05 PM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Kamil: BTW, there is no use repeating old discussions about vids like those of Stevan. Many people have reviewed that vid (I probably watched it 20 times myself,too) and there is simply no way to determine with 100% certainty that his vid isn't legit. And repeating opinions will never change that. My opinion about these things always is that if you don't have 100% proof of someone cheating, you shouldn't accuse him, because wrongfully accusing someone is in my opinion worse than a cheat uncaught. Remember that before I sent you proof about my gameplay in DF:BHD, you didn't think it was possible to consistently shoot 80-100% headshots and you were convinced I cheated as well ![]() Anyway, If you or anyone else has doubts about someone on Damiens ranking, I think it's best if you discuss this with Damien and not on the guestbook, because it only creates paranoia, adds negativity and you risk ruining reputations of legit players. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Sep 1st 2008 at 12:38:29 PM |
|
Name: |
Ronny |
Comments: |
@Kamil: Can't you just recreate those boards on Minesweeper Clone and UPK them on Clone instead of Arbiter? |
![]() |
Viewing Page 8 of 27 (Total Entries: 2685) |