The Authoritative Minesweeper Guestbook

Feel free to chat, make suggestions, or tell your scores!

  First Page
  Prev Page
  Post
  Home
Next Page  
Last Page  
Viewing Page 8 of 27 (Total Entries: 2658)
Oct 3rd 2007 at 01:47:36 PM
Name:  

daniel

Comments:  

sry i forhot to mention that i cant handle a flag style with very few flags...thats the problem ..and there are only 35 sub90s

   
Oct 3rd 2007 at 01:43:16 PM
Name:  

daniel

Comments:  

79 (on a 190) (85nf on a 148) -> 72 nf on a 138 board
now i dont know anymore wether play with or without flags...15 out of my 53 sub90 games are nf. my 3bv/s are higher with flags, but its the low 3bV boards the highscores are made on and on these boards i got lower 3bv/s and i think i'm faster nf...
hsomeone out there who can help me?

another question..whats the imc and its task?

   
Oct 3rd 2007 at 01:26:59 PM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

I agree (again).

   
Oct 3rd 2007 at 12:57:22 PM
Name:  

WP

Comments:  

In view of the recent discussion, I would like to suggest (again) that IMC discussions be made public, because non-IMC members might be able to bring in fresh ideas or a different insight to a topic.

   
Oct 3rd 2007 at 06:42:38 AM
Name:  

fritz löhr

Comments:  

@christoph
thanks a lot

i left the website box empty
i'll try it one more time to see if it was temporary or caused by my pc

   
Oct 3rd 2007 at 02:00:28 AM
Name:  

Christoph

Comments:  

@Fritz: That's strange. I just tested it again and it worked fine. Also your requests arrived and I just activated you password.
What exactly did you enter?
There should be no need to give a website.

   
Oct 2nd 2007 at 11:30:11 AM
Name:  

fritz löhr

Best intermediate:  

17 (clone)

Best beginner:  

2,36 (winmine)

Comments:  

played beginner on winmine for 2 hours today.
after 30min i had a 3BV=2 board ... and hit a mine cuz i was too fast
but after 1 hour i played int as a little break ... and got from 20 to 18 on a 33 board . it gave me wings and now i got from 2x5;3x33;4x >150 to 2x9;3X36;4x19more. for sure it's like nothing compared to what some people here can get in 2 hours but it made me quite happy that i can get 2 and 3sec games in "short time" .
@ the IMC guys : i tried to request a password on minesweeper.cc but as i have no own website it said fatal error... . is it a mistake on the site or do i need to enter a website's name? can you please help me with this thing

   
Oct 2nd 2007 at 09:24:09 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Best expert:  

61, 62NF

Best intermediate:  

12x2 NF

Best beginner:  

1x2 NF

Comments:  

65NF on 177 -> 50 sub70 But all the time Ive got more sub16 ints : 12x2, 13x7, 14x25, 15x46

   
Oct 2nd 2007 at 09:08:11 AM
Name:  

Schu (Andrew McCauley)

Comments:  

Well, good not to be *completely* and utterly wrong about who wrote. Oh well. I'm going to suggest, publicly, too all of you, that for the next IMC elections, willingness and time to look at the IMC forums and vote on things and decide things be more important than things like experience and how much you know people and how much you agree with them. Because earlier this year, only 4 of us regularly did this and I've gotten jaded about it and not bothered much lately (though I am very hopeful that this current situation proves to be a catalyst for more action).

Email Email    
Oct 2nd 2007 at 02:53:32 AM
Name:  

Gergely

Comments:  

Yeah, it's a bit of a reach to blame IMC for not doing anything but if you think so you can punish us soon at the upcoming election.
BUT I have to tell you that IMC members organized two tournaments this year, improved gameplay of these tournaments.
Anyway, it's a real problem we face i.e. IMC is not an authority. We do it in our freetime, it's only known by a few people, we doesn't get much input for our decisions. I'd call for all sweepers to come up with problems - like Joni's regarding the acceptance of the clones. (Thank you, Joni, I appreciate the work you put into your study! )
Because if only a few people is being active (just look at IMC ranking boards: mainly regular AR-submitters are there only) then it's a lost case. (Oh well, an integrated ranking is being worked on - did you notice?)

I'd like to call for sweepers who are willing to say: "I support an ORGANIZATION which cares about the improvements of the game. I'd like to be a member of it, thus giving it power through the number of listed supporters to acquire sources for making better tournaments and software."

Are you willing to?

Email Email    
Oct 2nd 2007 at 12:29:16 AM
Name:  

AreOut

Comments:  

BECAUSE HE IS JAKE THE JAKE!!!!

   
Oct 2nd 2007 at 12:06:06 AM
Name:  

joni

Comments:  


>There you are, finally forced to take a decision (is it your first? after 9 months) and what do you do? Just take a random [arbitrary as always] decision on which clones to accept.

Well, to me at least, it was blatantly obvious it was me who wrote it... and I thought it would have been for you (IMC guys) too (notice the word FORCED! among other things), just didn't want to ruin the sarcasm of the post throwing my name in there... although i did claim authorship in the IRC if it makes you feel better, Schu
-------------
The editor of the IMC Times would like to express his deepest apologies because the latest issue contained an error. That was ABSOLUTELY NOT the first decision the IMC has taken this year, it was no less than the SECOND. After 4 months of hard work in April the IMC decided not to accept Vista scores (ooh that was a tough one ), and now after 9 months decided that Clone and Arbiter are valid (wow, that's unheard of! btw do your Clones .96 and .97 even comply with your own 3BV limits decision?), and from unofficial sources we come to learn that X is being also considered. So there's more exiting news to come on this issue, when X is turned down by February next year!!
----------------
I thought it was time for a refreshing slap

>And the chinese games are still valid, just takes a bit of effort to be able to view.

well that's what everyone wants, if you (Schu) and Rodrigo can view them, then it shouldn't be that hard to integrate it as a separate routine in Clone (the same way one can watch Arbiter videos). And if you ask me that should have been at the top of the priority list for the 2007 Clone. But you (IMC) didn't do anything and Rodrigo didn't consider that important.
That's the point I'm trying to make: Stop Waiting, Start Acting! You CAN! you have the power (some kind of undefined power but you have it). Why wait indefinitely for a non-.NET Clone version? The way I see it Clone and .Net are by now inseparable..
Don't want .Net but want history? go for Arbiter!
Want a basic, pocketsized clone, to occasionally play on a pc you have minimal rights, and you couldn't care less about history? There is an option for that too... but I'm afraid you have to stick to old winmine... unless a miracle happens in the next say 6 months.

[I think in the past two days I have well compensated for my inactivity for the past two months, and that of the coming two .
Have a nice time everybody!]

Email Email    
Oct 1st 2007 at 11:18:52 PM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

Why Jake?

   
Oct 1st 2007 at 08:53:57 PM
Name:  

Kat

Comments:  

Yeah Schu, it just MUST have been jake.

   
Oct 1st 2007 at 07:48:49 PM
Name:  

Schu (Andrew McCauley)

Comments:  

Well that can only be Jake. Or maaaaaaaaaybe Joni, but I really doubt it.

The problems with old versions of arbiter make illegal games and therefore are completely unacceptable. the games made with .97 and .96 are legal with the exception of obvious UPK games, and fairly easily spottable cheats. And the chinese games are still valid, just takes a bit of effort to be able to view.

Of course we are all hoping that rodrigo will make the lite non-.NET version that he plans, but until then there's no way I'd vote to make people that don't want .NET forced to use arbiter to make legal records. I wasn't there for the meeting unfortunately, but I agree with the decisions.

You could at least have the courage to attach your name to what you write.

Email Email    
Oct 1st 2007 at 02:52:55 PM
Name:  

the IMC Times

Best expert:  

WAR IS PEACE

Best intermediate:  

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

Best beginner:  

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

Comments:  

/me applaudes furiously...
YES!!! our beloved and worshiped IMC has taken a decision!!! And has done so on probably the hottest issue of the moment. A big Hurray for the IMC!!!.
Here's exclusively, an extract from yesterday's fruitful meeting:

" - And then there's Clone 0.97
- Oh, that's a nice clone
- yeah! i have nothing against that
- hmm, i remember it used to crash on a record
- yeah, that's not so nice...
- oh and then there's that automatic switch to UPK mode with 86 mines, when the Moon is crossing the equator
- yeah, one needs to be careful with that, but hey it's an MS CLONE!
- yeah, MS CLONE IS THE BEST, we can always mention it's not one of the recommended ones
- good idea!
- great, lets move on to the next one... Minesweeper Board Reader v0.01
"
it's always wonderful to hear the voice of the Party! [long applause] Big Brother!! Big Brother!!

and now, for our two minutes Hate: A message from Emanuel Goldstein
[booooooooo]
----------------
You know, when this new IMC was voted, I really had good expectations, if not for the simple reason that it was next to impossible to do worse than the previous one... Yet, somehow you have managed to prove me wrong and raise the uselessness of the IMC to previously thought unreachable levels.
There you are, finally forced to take a decision (is it your first? after 9 months) and what do you do? Just take a random [arbitrary as always] decision on which clones to accept. What's more Clone 0.97 makes the shortlist, and 0.96 is even recommended! Are we NUTS?!! Have you even asked Rodrigo what he thinks about it? Even if we try not to think for a moment of the crashes and weird behaviours of 0.97... have you never heard of the security attacks Rilian has performed on those two clones and reported to Rodrigo (sometimes posting them up and down in his forums much to Rodrigo's frustration)? Does the name Jason Tran remind you something? Any ideas why Rodrigo added a level of complexity with the .NET Framework? Now, I know most of you worship the Clone, but is it really worth it to consider valid such dinosaur versions just because Clone 2006/7 uses the framework, and you need to cover up its as.s? Can you even be more biased?

Remember last year when Arbiter had the clicking bug? You (or some of you) made it clear to Rilian that Arbiter videos with the bug were not going to be accepted, and he was forced to put the fixing of the bug at the top of his improvements list for the next version. You used your power, Arbiter became a better clone, everybody won. Why isn't Clone receiving the same treatment?
For example, we have our asian friends that can't play on the 2006/2007 Clones because of their charsets. So they are stuck with 0.97, and for some reason the effect of the Moon in that part of the world is not to get you to UPK mode, but to alter your videos. As a result we can't watch any videos our fellow chinese or japanese sweepers make... The problem was there on the 2006, it remained there on the 2007. Why not make an ultimatum to Rodrigo this time? If not to fix the 2007 version for the Asian fonts, at least to make these altered 0.97 videos viewable from clone2007. We know he is busy, and no-one is asking him to put his work aside, what this would really mean is that whenever he has time to work on the Clone, this would be his top priority. Another win-win situation. And if Rodrigo doesn't comply, he risks to lose his asian users, who might then be forced to discover a clone which works with every charset, is de facto accepted in both rankings, doesn't need the framework, and whose setup+helpfile+7skins+40vids even fit on a floppy...
That would sound like an alternative to the Clone+framework combination if you'd ask me... but if the program in question hasn't made it into your shortlist, then I'm sure it must have failed on one of your very rigorous benchmarks.
-----------------
[more boooooooooos and wild screams]
Down with Goldstein! Love Big Brother!! Big Brother!!

   
Oct 1st 2007 at 06:43:58 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

@ Serpenter:
12 on winmine -> 12x2 (12,011) on clone

   
Oct 1st 2007 at 01:15:10 AM
Name:  

Serpenter_e

Comments:  

KAmil Muranski
Best intermediate:
12 winminexp no vid -> 12,011 NF!!!!!!!

Kamil, how did you know exactly time 12.011 on winmine?

   
Sep 30th 2007 at 02:49:53 PM
Name:  

Arjádre

Best expert:  

3.256

Best intermediate:  

3.835

Best beginner:  

5.00x flagging --->5.047 non-flagging

Comments:  

Kinda random, but I'm happy!
3.774 on a 14 3BV board
Incidentally 14 clicks for an IOE of 1!
And it's not a baby board, either- 3 islands and 3 openings.

Video linked.

Email Email     Website Website    
Sep 30th 2007 at 01:58:19 PM
Name:  

IMC

Comments:  

Today the IMC decided that scores made on certain older versions of Arbiter and the Clone will no longer be accepted for the world rankings. Legal versions and downloads can be found at www.minesweeper.cc on the Decision and Rules pages.

Legal versions are as follows:

Clone2007, Clone2006, Clone97, Clone96
Arbiter.46, Arbiter.45

    Website Website    
Sep 30th 2007 at 12:40:40 PM
Name:  

daniel

Best expert:  

79

Best intermediate:  

19

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

yes
finally qualified for the world anking
this evening i made my scores in beg and int 2s better

   
Sep 30th 2007 at 12:18:39 PM
Name:  

Tam Minh Bui

Comments:  

I'm really excited today because I finally attained my first sub-3 second sup-10 board beginner game. Damien reached it before me, but I got 2,92 on a 12 board as he did! I promise to not bother you guys with anymore beginner records, and I will try to improve on the other modes more ^^v

Just happy!

    Website Website    
Sep 30th 2007 at 10:59:09 AM
Name:  

KAmil Muranski

Best expert:  

61 Fl 62NF

Best intermediate:  

12 winminexp no vid -> 12,011 NF!!!!!!!

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

WHY IT WASNT 0,012s faster?????????

   
Sep 30th 2007 at 09:48:12 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

141/145 est 59NF lost on a guess Expert is my favourite level

   
Sep 30th 2007 at 05:41:09 AM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

let me guess, no vid?

   
Sep 30th 2007 at 01:05:10 AM
Name:  

Ja

Best expert:  

3bv-4.70

Best intermediate:  

3bv=5.9x->6.27

Best beginner:  

3bv=... 9??

Comments:  

BOO YAAAA

[01:10:07] * Badgers last int game --> Est Time=16,13 3BV=95 / 95 @ 6,27 RQP=2,57 c/s=6,07 IOE=1,03 :E

    Website Website    
Sep 29th 2007 at 09:50:58 AM
Name:  

Ian

Comments:  

55 sub-55s! Glad to finally break that important milestone Good luck with the world record Zhang And congrats all record breakers.

Also broke RQP record yesterday with 53.56 on a 184 (3.501 3BV/s, 15.303 RQP).

Email Email    
Sep 29th 2007 at 09:17:21 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

@Tibor: Dont worry, u will beat my record soon
I scored 3 sup 3,5 3bv/s Int NF in 20 mins playing but still I cant get sup4
Also got my 500th 3s beginner + 1x2 and 2x85

   
Sep 28th 2007 at 02:39:36 PM
Name:  

Tibor

Comments:  

NEW WORLD RECORD!!!

KAMIL MURANSKI PostOnGuestbook/day WR holder!!!

Grats Kamil: yuo're really on fire!

Email Email    
Sep 28th 2007 at 10:20:25 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

Exp NF 2,73 -> 2,865 3bv/s, 65s on 185

   
Sep 28th 2007 at 08:03:49 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

Beg 5,588 -> 5,755 3bv/s on 28

   
Sep 28th 2007 at 05:08:24 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

lol I got 19NF on 39 int, my worst time on sub40 board ever also got my 7th 13s int (6th NF) on 38. If I get 31-33 board with 1-2 openings and no guessing I will get 10 or 11, but it takes a lot of time to get so easy board. 1 month ago I clicked on mine in 2nd move on 35 board with 1 opening, 11,2 1st try in UPK

   
Sep 27th 2007 at 01:55:24 PM
Name:  

fritz löhr

Best expert:  

69

Best intermediate:  

17,335====>17,170

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

not a whole second but at least a new record and 4th sub20. 3BV=41 @ 2.536 ; also new personal best rpq but actually i only care about time and 3BV/sec. i'm gonna upload it tomorrow cuz i have to do a lot of homework to do.
@kamil firstly grats to your 62 . although you didn't break one minute barrier you still got closer, don't give up man . then about the 3BV thing: i think everyone has almost the same 3BV average on all boards together, finished or not. but actually i have unusal many low int 3BV rates lately (about 5 times less than 40(finished 1) and 15 times less than 50(finished 4) in the last half hour). maybe there's a difference in how i sweep that i finish (at least recognize) more low 3BV boards than you but instead maybe you finish more higher 3BV games. i guess it#s all mainly momentary and i can change anytime.one more thing. i had a 20 on 32 yesterday. can you try to play this 32 too pleasewhen i played it on upk i got a 17 on first try.
@jason k
i played int NF te last days and it improved all my int and exp records but it also slowed down my flagging skills. it also made my right hand ache after sweepeing cuz it was unusual to have so many left clicks. so i decided to stop playing int NF and try to start reaching my goals for the rest of the year (more sub20 and sub70)
@ all: i'm very tired while writing this post, so if there#s anything dumb in this post please ignore it

   
Sep 27th 2007 at 12:52:24 PM
Name:  

KAmil

Best expert:  

NF 63-> 62,004

Comments:  

on 133, nice record but it could be 0,005s faster

   
Sep 27th 2007 at 09:04:50 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

@FritzLohr I tried to play your 17 int board. 11,8 NF 1st try Why I dont get so easy boards?

   
Sep 27th 2007 at 06:00:24 AM
Name:  

Alexandr

Best expert:  

130

Best intermediate:  

54

Best beginner:  

12

Comments:  

Hi there!
I just have finished my game 3D Minesweeper.
Now you can find board presets, such Beginer, Professional, Expert.
Also i adding some extra bonuses to the game:
- Extra life
- Unhide bombs
- Computer calculate percentage for cells.

Now comlete install & uninstall.

Please, look at my game and say - what new features you need in game?

Email Email     Website Website    
Sep 26th 2007 at 03:55:24 AM
Name:  

AreOut

Comments:  

Scary to see you still playing tard...

   
Sep 25th 2007 at 11:30:08 PM
Name:  

Tam Minh Bui

Best beginner:  

1 (x20)

Comments:  

I don't have much time to play seriously nowadays, but I achieved my 20th one-second game recently. In addition, I played my 5th sup-7 3bv/s game with 4.97 seconds @ 29 3bv. Both videos in my profile.

Scary to see world records almost being broken, and not by Dion himself this time...

   
Sep 25th 2007 at 07:57:33 PM
Name:  

Zhang Shen Jia

Comments:  

Rubik's cube 3x3x3 10 times average : 17.00 second!

a China Rubik's cube tournament will be hold in Guang Zhou at Oct.1 , of course I will join it.

   
Sep 25th 2007 at 10:51:52 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

138/147 est 54 NF lost on a guess

   
Sep 25th 2007 at 10:38:23 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

Int NF 15 played at school now my school ranking is 2-15-65. I can play about 20 mins/week if teacher dont see
rubiks cube 4x4x4 4:03 -> 3:36

   
Sep 25th 2007 at 10:08:34 AM
Name:  

Christoph

Comments:  

fixed :)
seems like you didn't check the AR-checkbox

   
Sep 25th 2007 at 12:37:50 AM
Name:  

manuel heider

Comments:  

@ christoph

i submitted AR scores (12-44) last friday , but now i got a penalty ...
u can see the scores on claimed scores, i dont know why they are not on the AR...

can u please fix that?

grats zhang, but i still have more sub50s :P
mfg

   
Sep 24th 2007 at 11:06:50 AM
Name:  

Charles (aka Knolan)

Comments:  

@KAmil ;
I used to have a mx518 and I switched to a G5.
Honestly G5 is slightly better but it won't change your life.

Be sure to buy a good mouse pad if you get a laser mouse (like the nova killer ^^).

   
Sep 24th 2007 at 08:39:14 AM
Name:  

Zhang Shen Jia

Best expert:  

42.42

Comments:  

today got 8 sub50 games(with a 43.04 in 130), and broke 3bv/s record.

now got 42x2,43x3,44x9,45x21,46x28,47x31,48x43,49x45, total 182 sub50 games.

   
Sep 24th 2007 at 07:57:42 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

@Zhang: few days after your 1st sup4 u almost breaked the world record amazing
@All: what mouse is better: Logitech Mx518 or G5? my father use my mx518 amlost all the time and I cant play, so I want to buy new mouse

   
Sep 24th 2007 at 06:56:54 AM
Name:  

Zhang Shen Jia

Best expert:  

4.04 -> 4.18 !!!

Comments:  

57.24 in 235 board.

after blasted 4.64, finally I broke my record ...

   
Sep 23rd 2007 at 12:10:48 PM
Name:  

fritz

Comments:  

@ jason k
i'll give int nf a try
i wanna keep playing int for the next month (2 weeks nf 2 weeks f). but then i think i'll need to improve exp for the rest of the year.

   
Sep 23rd 2007 at 09:39:31 AM
Name:  

Roman Gammel

Comments:  

@Kamil: You have to get sub60 soon. You deserved that. Just continue playing

   
Sep 23rd 2007 at 06:52:51 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Best expert:  

61 flag, 63 NF

Comments:  

I played expert for 4 hours
157/159 est 62 NF - lost on a guess
154/157 est 61 NF - lost on a guess
146/148 est 60 NF - lost on a guess
That's why expert = SHlT

   
Sep 22nd 2007 at 07:07:19 PM
Name:  

Jason K.

Comments:  

@Fritz: For sure, Top 100 is a great goal to shoot for. I'm sure you've heard it before, but playing Int NF is a great way to increase efficiency and lower your times. Keep at it!

   
Sep 22nd 2007 at 01:54:12 PM
Name:  

Kat

Best expert:  

61

Best intermediate:  

16

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

I just got my 10th sub70 exp! another 66

katcas Last flagging exp: 66.457s - 154@2.353 - Rks: 3/79 - OBV=165.03@2.521, IOE=0.592, RQP=28.244 - 3.97cks/s - 15op, 12isl - 74% flagging (73fl)

RQP Rk 1

   
Sep 21st 2007 at 02:02:33 PM
Name:  

fritz löhr

Comments:  

@ jason k
well, yes i can't argue with a 17 in my 3rd sub20 game ever. but i hope i'll be able to get some more sub20s 'cause 1x17, 2x19 is allright for me but definetely not good enough to get in the top100 (isn't that the goal of every1 in the world ranking )

   
Sep 21st 2007 at 01:14:14 PM
Name:  

Christoph

Comments:  

Well, yes... also Joni has impressive scores...
I'm in Salzburg right now on a writers meeting. I need to have a closer look on the problem as I can have it from the public computer here.
I'll be back in Vienna on Sunday and fix it right away then (that'll take just a view minutes).

   
Sep 21st 2007 at 12:47:56 PM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

I thought that I will never know my date of sum sub100 (1-20-76), because I lost my 76 exp vid and didnt know date. I asked all my friends, but no1 had got my vid. After 3 months I found a screenshot of my 76 (I forgot about it before)
@Damien: my turned pro date is 12 Jan 2007, put this info in the profile plz
Rubik's cube 3x3 41x2 -> 38

   
Sep 21st 2007 at 10:18:16 AM
Name:  

Jason K.

Best intermediate:  

15

Comments:  

Nice game, Fritz! A better score might have been possible, but you can't argue with a 2 second jump

Email Email    
Sep 21st 2007 at 09:03:36 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

Int NF14x2 and 15 today, also 3,911 3bv/s, but I cant break my 3,965 NF record

   
Sep 21st 2007 at 07:50:39 AM
Name:  

fritz

Best expert:  

69

Best intermediate:  

19,310==>17,335

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

pretty easy board 3BV=34
i think a faster score was possible on this board.
video is in my folder

   
Sep 20th 2007 at 07:44:29 PM
Name:  

Jason

Best expert:  

104

Best intermediate:  

38

Best beginner:  

4

Comments:  

I didn't see this on the cheat list but if you press esc the timer stops. I have win2000.

Email Email    
Sep 20th 2007 at 03:58:42 PM
Name:  

Arjádre

Best expert:  

whatever my last record was ---> 2.753 3BV/s NF

Comments:  

68.924@187
Also a possible NF RQP record (25.035)
@Damien: nice!

   
Sep 20th 2007 at 03:49:02 PM
Name:  

damien

Comments:  

tonight is the first time in a month i was able to play minesweeper more than 10 minutes without my (middle) finger stopping and refusing to work. in 1h i got 52, 53, 49, 48, 47 made me feel young again

   
Sep 20th 2007 at 06:38:36 AM
Name:  

Bertie

Comments:  

I just quickly want to congratulate Tommy on the 1 sec time he got on the AR for int
Chris, you might want to check that out.

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 11:40:19 PM
Name:  

Roman Gammel

Comments:  

AR deadline tomorrow...

    Website Website    
Sep 19th 2007 at 12:07:55 PM
Name:  

Nikolaj

Comments:  

Thanks guys

@joni: for good? We'll see Nevertheless I think I won't be able to get 11 (at least for very very long time). Time to focus on expert (especially finishing rate )

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 11:52:58 AM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

here goes an attempt to fix the width of the gb












grats niko!

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 11:52:41 AM
Name:  

Jake

Comments:  

apparently it censors out mast.ur.bate. d'oh.

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 11:52:21 AM
Name:  

Jake

Comments:  

SATAN ********** MY METALLIC SONATAS

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 11:52:05 AM
Name:  

Jake

Comments:  

are we there yet?

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 11:51:54 AM
Name:  

jake

Comments:  

ho hum

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 11:51:32 AM
Name:  

jake

Comments:  

pushing manu's screen-feces to the next page

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 09:42:02 AM
Name:  

joni

Comments:  

woooooow, i missed congratulating you on how many? 3 records? that goes to show how much I've been detached from the community lately ... Well I haven't got much to say , i remember that old 16 of yours (and remember matching it a few days later) saying something about hopefully our 15s would have looked better . not much has changed i'm afraid except the fact that now you're back ahead of me, and this time for good

Email Email    
Sep 19th 2007 at 08:37:03 AM
Name:  

Nikolaj

Comments:  

well, I got my 1st 16 17.8.2006 and the 2nd more than 1 year later - 4.9.2007 then 15 6 days ago and today 14 and 12

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 07:14:53 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

@Niko: 16->12 in 6 days? after my 16x3->13 it took me 3,5 months to get 12 NF
@All: Yesterday I put 2 new videos to my folder but date on modification is all the time 29 July. What happened?

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 05:01:05 AM
Name:  

AreOut

Comments:  

Grats Niko

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 04:38:22 AM
Name:  

Nikolaj

Best intermediate:  

16x2=>15=>14=>12 in 6 days

Comments:  

Sorry Christoph, looks like I'm on a hot streak now beware Rogen ! Next goal 2ndsub 60

    Website Website    
Sep 19th 2007 at 04:33:56 AM
Name:  

Nikolaj

Comments:  

WTF?!

    Website Website    
Sep 19th 2007 at 02:27:50 AM
Name:  

Christoph

Best expert:  

54

Best intermediate:  

14

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

@Robert: Yariv needs to fix nonosweeper.com as fast as possible! You've just too much time to play minesweeper. Luckyly I got this 54 the other day - you're really catching up on me

   
Sep 19th 2007 at 02:11:19 AM
Name:  

Nikolaj

Best intermediate:  

15=>14

Comments:  

nothing special... just 2nd record in 6 days. this time on very nice 32 board. someone could try to UPK it, I believe this could be a sub10 board. too bad I'm so slow

oh and Zhang and Manu heads up, Dion is already scared

    Website Website    
Sep 18th 2007 at 04:48:35 PM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

what a pity, great vid indeed.

   
Sep 18th 2007 at 04:11:42 PM
Name:  

Michael

Comments:  

That's an awesome video Zhang Shen Jia, it was unlucky because you were lightning fast.

   
Sep 18th 2007 at 12:00:21 PM
Name:  

Zhang Shen Jia

Best expert:  

4.04

Comments:  

3BV:214/218
3BV/s:4.64
estim:47.98

nothing, just blasted a world record...

manu ... I just follow you...

check this video...

    Website Website    
Sep 18th 2007 at 11:41:18 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

1 minute after 3bv/s record beg NF 1,997 -> 1,765 on 4

   
Sep 18th 2007 at 11:38:59 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

Beg NF 5,311 -> 5,376

   
Sep 17th 2007 at 06:01:42 PM
Name:  

Michael

Best expert:  

61

Best intermediate:  

13

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

@Kat: to get your averages from the last two months, just open the history file on clone and enter the date of two months ago into the bottom left corner sorting options. If you're using arbiter, there's probably something similar but I can't remember too well, I always use the clone.

@Christian: My records are fairly similar (my 13 int was a one-off mega-easy board, my next best score is 16.3) but my averages aren't too good. I've been playing expert almost exclusively for the past two months, and my average is about 78. I have a really poor completion rate though, so that may affect it.

   
Sep 17th 2007 at 02:18:51 PM
Name:  

joni

Comments:  

hahaha Ostriches, you're making it sound like a soap opera I really hope Badgers doesn't get involved in any accident and get into a coma during the next episode

   
Sep 17th 2007 at 11:22:49 AM
Name:  

Ostriches

Comments:  

There is no story. He doesn't remember a **** thing. We're trying to put the pieces together.

   
Sep 17th 2007 at 09:18:43 AM
Name:  

Christoph

Best expert:  

54

Comments:  

After getting this stupid illegal 55 it's a great thing to jump right down to 54.

And I'm really looking forward to hear jakes 36 story. Up to now I heard only that there's no vid what sounds very interesting since one cannot switch off the autosaving of timerecords in arbiter.

    Website Website    
Sep 16th 2007 at 11:08:48 PM
Name:  

Serpenter_e

Comments:  

Anyway, this is very impressive video, Manu. Tensions are growing

   
Sep 16th 2007 at 10:15:02 PM
Name:  

jake got a 36

Best expert:  

6

Comments:  

YESYES
[22:20:59] (00:28:51) ***Badgers last exp game --> Est Time=36,61 3BV=130 / 130 @ 3,65 RQP=10,02 c/s=6,06 IOE=0,60
[22:20:59] (00:28:55) Badgers: TO ALL THAT ****ED ME.
[22:20:59] (00:28:57) Badgers: **** YOU.
[22:20:59] (00:28:58) Badgers: ENDUT.
[22:20:59] (00:28:59) Badgers: HOCH.
[22:20:59] (00:29:01) Badgers: HECH.


   
Sep 16th 2007 at 07:30:54 PM
Name:  

Kat

Comments:  

@Cristian: Sorry, i have no idea how to work out averages over 2 months. Happy to talk to you about it though.... my email is below.

Email Email    
Sep 16th 2007 at 05:43:56 PM
Name:  

Zhang Shen Jia

Best expert:  

42

Comments:  

@Marco: check this url : http://www.saolei.net/download/index.asp

@Mauel: pool man! but don't trouble for that. I blasted a 35 game (96/105) a month ago . just fighting!

   
Sep 16th 2007 at 01:13:03 PM
Name:  

fritz löhr

Best expert:  

69

Best intermediate:  

20===>19,310

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

first sub 20
19.310 sec on 3BV=43
i didn't expect to get a sub20 with a 3BV/s better than 2.00 .
vid is in my folder
@ marco : i think you can download arbiter on : http://rilian.info/files.php?id=2
@ manuel : that was so close to a new wr. but it shows that you can get it. keep trying .
i can remember when my record on exp was 78 i was at 72sec but i forgot only one square and ended up with 82.

   
Sep 16th 2007 at 10:25:50 AM
Name:  

Nikolaj

Comments:  

@daniel: Yariv has trouble with the website host, he will move all his websites soon.

   
Sep 16th 2007 at 09:26:17 AM
Name:  

Marco

Comments:  

@ Bertie: Where can I find Arbiter?

   
Sep 16th 2007 at 08:43:20 AM
Name:  

KAmil

Comments:  

!!!!!!

   
Sep 16th 2007 at 07:30:10 AM
Name:  

mauel heider

Best expert:  

42

Comments:  

my biggest blast ever....120 /122 est 36 !!!!!!
so **** close
almost made me cry ....
check out the vid ...

http://www.minesweeper.info/videoindex.php?dir=ManuelHeider/&file=blasted%20exp%20-%2036%2C161%20s%20-%203BV%20122%20-%20Manuel%20Heider%20-%2016.%20September%202007%20-%2016h43m20s.mvf
(website url did not work !? )
mfg
:(

   
Sep 15th 2007 at 11:35:26 PM
Name:  

joni

Comments:  

@Kamil: There must be sth with you Polish people, why do you need to be so extreme? . I mean 2-14-44 vs 1-12-61 ... you really need to get in touch with Lukasz, and "work on your differences" .

   
Sep 15th 2007 at 05:16:43 PM
Name:  

damien

Comments:  

@kat: nice!

@gero: can you send me an email? for some reason, i don't have your scores on the site! damienalexmoore@yahoo.com ...

   
Sep 15th 2007 at 03:44:53 PM
Name:  

Daniel Brim

Comments:  

Since we seem to have a few nono players posting at the moment... what's up with the nonosweeper page? Any word on if or when it will be fixed?

   
Sep 15th 2007 at 03:02:27 PM
Name:  

Cristian

Comments:  

Kat, what's your average in each of the levels if possible the last two months? I ask it because our scores were very similar until you reached that 61 on exp and 16 on int. What is the average of the other players whose records are similar to that?

Email Email    


  First Page
  Prev Page
  Post
  Home
Next Page  
Last Page  
Viewing Page 8 of 27 (Total Entries: 2658)


powered by Powered by Bravenet bravenet.com