Viewing Page 33 of 53 (Total Entries: 5262) |
![]() |
|
Jan 20th 2006 at 02:35:00 PM |
|
Name: |
Rasmus H. Jensen |
Best intermediate: |
3,46 ----> 3,85 3BV/s |
Comments: |
Very good day of sweeping ![]() 4,68 + 3,85 + 2,81 = 11,34 Finally broke 11 ![]() Ooh and I went sub 70 five times today - but nothing near sub 60 ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 20th 2006 at 05:26:10 AM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
Right George, however never heard of you ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 20th 2006 at 12:04:04 AM |
|
Name: |
Georg Küpper |
Comments: |
illminded do |
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 08:20:45 PM |
|
Name: |
Schu |
Comments: |
Which conveniently takes 1 3bv beginner out of the picture!! I don't think anyone supports 1 3bv beginner at all. |
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 08:09:18 PM |
|
Name: |
Schu |
Comments: |
****, I mean 1+ ((time-1)*(3bvlimit-1)/(3bv-1)) |
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 08:06:55 PM |
|
Name: |
Schu |
Comments: |
Actually, come to think of it, maybe we should account for the first click being on 0.00 (well, 1.00) seconds, usually getting 1 3bv (always if it's a corner click). Maybe formula should be ((Time-1)/(3bv-1))* (3bvlimit-1) |
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 08:00:30 PM |
|
Name: |
Schu |
Comments: |
Intermediate, obviously. |
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 07:55:26 PM |
|
Name: |
Andrew McCauley (Schu) |
Best expert: |
64 |
Best intermediate: |
15 |
Best beginner: |
2 |
Comments: |
About my suggestion for modifying low-3bv scores, my justification for it is that (for example) a 2 3bv/s on a 25 3bv board is worth just as much as a 2 3bv/s on a 30 3bv board (if not even better), because we all know high 3bv/s is hard to get on low 3bv/s boards. On a slightly related note, I got my first ever simultaneous >3 3bv/s and sub-20! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 03:13:43 PM |
|
Name: |
Dmitriy |
Comments: |
yeah, i finished whole 13 exp games this year. averages are 91 sec 1,87 3bv/s. 11 sub100, 7 sub90. best is 84 sec on 162 3bv board ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 02:56:50 PM |
|
Name: |
Elmar |
Comments: |
Dmitriy plays minesweeper?!? ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 01:04:15 PM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Comments: |
@Levente: Wait, you mean Dmitriy plays expert? ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 05:03:34 AM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
don't discourage him, Dmitriy. Janos: play more expert than Dmitriy does. He plays like 2 exp games a week and is surprised that he randomly pulled a 78 and got on bestever ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 04:33:57 AM |
|
Name: |
Dmitriy |
Comments: |
@Levente: grr.. that is not that easy to get bestever ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 04:23:17 AM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
@Janos: play fast! :-) In order to appear on bestever, your totals on the three levels must sum to 99 or less. You're almost there! then, go to the planet-minesweeper bestever submission page (see link). |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 19th 2006 at 03:34:04 AM |
|
Name: |
Kelbert János |
Best expert: |
119 |
Best intermediate: |
39 |
Best beginner: |
4 |
Comments: |
How is it possible to take place on the world records list? Is that based on this Guestbook? I'm from Hungary! Thanks! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 07:47:19 PM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
/me tries desperately to come up with a good joke based on the fact that you said "come". I should be able to, yeah. Sounds good! |
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 07:29:06 PM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Comments: |
@Levente: LA regional robotics competition... last weekend in March. You should come! |
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 06:34:52 PM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Best expert: |
72.27 |
Best intermediate: |
18.83 |
Best beginner: |
2.69 |
Comments: |
@Dan Downing: the best advice I can think of is learn to recognise 1-2-2-1 and 1-2-1 patterns in all forms, even if they are obscured by the presence of other mines. For example, if you have a mine next to 2-2-2-1, then you can factor out the mine next to the first 2, resulting in 1-2-2-1. Pretty much, always remember to subtract out already-identified mines, to get more recognisable patterns. There are lots of 1-2-1s and 1-2-2-1s if you know where to look! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 06:30:43 PM |
|
Name: |
Dan Downing |
Best expert: |
120 |
Best intermediate: |
28 |
Best beginner: |
3 |
Comments: |
im more of an intermediate person, but i really want to hammer down my expert time. any pointers? |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 05:09:40 PM |
|
Name: |
Andrew McCauley (Schu) |
Best expert: |
64 |
Best intermediate: |
15 |
Best beginner: |
2 |
Comments: |
Well done DB and Lev! Sad to see you go Levente, we'll all miss you (you know, no-one really quits minesweeper). |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 03:09:22 PM |
|
Name: |
Rilian |
Comments: |
Finally we got why Stevan is so fast minesweeper. imc will have to decide if this is cheating! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 03:00:55 PM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
oh I'll still visit, if only to get my piece of the robotsex action. mmm... 152 feet of throbbing robot genitalia! ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 02:51:46 PM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Comments: |
I am also sad to see Levente go. I'll miss the rivalry that has taken shape in the last few weeks. And now you don't have an excuse to come down here! Maybe nonosweeper? Hmmm.... Arjadre: I'm sorry :-( Hopefully it won't get in the way too much, I need motivation! |
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 02:26:08 PM |
|
Name: |
Arjádre |
Comments: |
@DB: I'm officially frightened. ![]() @Levente: nice! ![]() @Whoever cares: My parents disconnected my computer from the internet and erased minesweeper (again)... So my sweeping is again forcefully cut back... It's just as well; midyear exams are next week, and I need to do well...(apparently there is something wrong with staying up till 3 in the morning sweeping ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 09:23:52 AM |
|
Name: |
Dmitriy |
Comments: |
Roman: now you may use ukrainian gas for heating ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 09:17:28 AM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
Hehe Roman its 7C here in Podgorica and Im freezing ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 06:38:41 AM |
|
Name: |
Roman Gammel |
Comments: |
Offtopic: It's really cold here, the temperature is the same as in Antarctic, and this antarctic summer covers almost all territory of Russia. In european part of the country it's -30C (weather.com says that current weather in Moscow is -28C and feels like -39C), in West Siberia -30C ... -40C, in north regions -50C, in East Siberia (Yakutia) -50C. I find out that aggregate power which Moscow use at this moment is 14,6 GWatt - this power could be produced not less than by 3 atomic power plants. "The day after tomorrow" and not in New York ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 04:11:01 AM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Best expert: |
72.27 on a 3bv=159 |
Comments: |
congrats, DBrim :-) I've officially retired. I got a 72.27 at the end of a psychologically imperfect run of sweeping. I've realised I get really caught up in this, and for me giving 100% effort means occasionally subverting my basic physiological needs. I blasted a 73 the other day simply because I nearly passed out at the end. Since I can't give less than 100% I have to retire... it's best for my health, really. And yeah, I erased the whole minesweeper folder from that one computer at work. Including the 72 video. When I was driving home, I realised the error of my ways. Oops. (Arbiter at home got burned to a CD, along with a bunch of videos, and filed away...) I'll still read the forum and all, but no more sweeping for me. I suppose if I actually *enjoyed* the adrenaline rush, it would've been something to continue, but no, it was frightening at best... but hey, cheaper than crystal meth! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 03:03:54 AM |
|
Name: |
Elmar |
Comments: |
Looks like minesweeper.org's client does support double-clicking now. |
![]() |
|
Jan 18th 2006 at 12:57:34 AM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Best expert: |
74.57-->72.65 |
Comments: |
On a 131 Look out Arjadre ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 07:15:57 PM |
|
Name: |
Schu again |
Comments: |
Damien, next time you update the site, fix the superstitions page, you're still decrying corner-clicking there. |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 06:43:25 PM |
|
Name: |
Andrew McCauley (Schu) |
Best expert: |
64 |
Best intermediate: |
15 |
Best beginner: |
2 |
Comments: |
I've seen purple 7 and black 8 (that was the first 8 I ever saw), but I like black 7 and grey 8 better. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 06:31:55 PM |
|
Name: |
Andrew McCauley (Schu) |
Best expert: |
64 |
Best intermediate: |
15 |
Best beginner: |
2 |
Comments: |
I'm sure dennis or martin or someone can get a quick nf 18 or something pretty quickly, hell, even I've gotten nf 18! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 06:24:15 PM |
|
Name: |
Dmitriy |
Comments: |
nah.. unfortunately that client does not support chording nor some kinds of doubleclicks so i doubt that 54 is a legal game ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 05:55:55 PM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
can someone PLEASE break the 54 record on that atrocity of a site (see link)? They apparently disdain MS clone, Dion's records, etc. Someone download their dang program and get a sub-54 within 2 minutes to pwn them already?? ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 05:54:28 PM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
... unless it's light grey. Depends on which version of winmine. The skin I find more aesthetically pleasing has light grey 8 and black 7. I wonder if the other skin has light grey 7 to go with the black 8? |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 05:53:59 PM |
|
Name: |
Elmar |
Comments: |
Actually these days the 8 is gray and the 7 is black. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 05:52:24 PM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
the 8 is black. See the link. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 05:35:38 PM |
|
Name: |
Krusz |
Best expert: |
241 |
Best intermediate: |
59 |
Best beginner: |
3 |
Comments: |
Has anyone ever seen an 8? I have seen the rare and elusive 7 only a few times, I was wondering what color an 8 is. |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 07:54:13 AM |
|
Name: |
Dmitriy |
Comments: |
Thomas: time to sub30 ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 06:56:15 AM |
|
Name: |
Thomas Kolar |
Best expert: |
89-->85 |
Best intermediate: |
30 |
Best beginner: |
9*9: 5 8*8: 6 |
Comments: |
My first record in months!!! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 05:17:29 AM |
|
Name: |
damien |
Comments: |
i updated the site two weeks ago, but only put it up today. i have not updated custom or the clone list nor resolved ties on ranking, as these are the first lists generated by my sql database rather than purely by hand. i spent most of december writing a completely new site, but it came to the point to either put a partial update now or make everyone wait until february for the new site...so: i'm expecting lots of complaints! the best feature so far is that the countries have correct spellings and states, so no one is listed from more than one country now, everyone has their names spelled correctly (or at least identically wrong on all lists) and the new site will have rankings for different versions including the clone. the feature i like least, is that i am ranked first. so: can dion and oli consider sending their times for both versions when they have time? also, roman, reid, marc, and elmar's times are obviously not correct either...but hey, i did fix several dozen other errors : ) anyways, please keep sending you correct times in to help clean the list. much appreciated. on a personal note...i haven't swept much for two months and my mouse is broke...the best in that time is a lone 57...ouch. hopefully i'll be in shape for budapest. see link on home page. |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 04:33:34 AM |
|
Name: |
Michele |
Best expert: |
72 |
Best intermediate: |
16 |
Best beginner: |
2 |
Comments: |
Someone can explain to me what's ios and rpq in minesweeper clone? I also can't find the right string to put in Naming convention option to put the date in the file name... Help me please! thk Michele |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 03:28:44 AM |
|
Name: |
Arjádre |
Comments: |
Um, that's a really high 3bv...grats! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 02:22:06 AM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Best expert: |
AR 74 |
Comments: |
and I want back the 73 I blasted. There was a big NF region I had with one space left. I identified. Incorrectly. This is why I never ever ever play NF. Because I'm ducking fumb, that's why. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 01:30:40 AM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Best expert: |
2.39 3bv/s |
Comments: |
@Levente: Nice job. Grrr.... I want a 248! |
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 01:14:47 AM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Best expert: |
2.52->2.55 3bv/s |
Comments: |
we're not gonna talk about the 69 on a 3bv=138 I blasted on the last click (50/50!)... instead, here is the longest game ever. 2.55 3bv/s on a 3bv=248. My hand is about to fall off. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 17th 2006 at 12:07:27 AM |
|
Name: |
Andrew McCauley (Schu) |
Best expert: |
64 |
Best intermediate: |
15 |
Best beginner: |
2 |
Comments: |
@ Levente: Nicely done. Anyone else not get the mine near the bottom right corner displayed on this video? @ WP: How is is like guessing estimated time? |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 10:52:08 PM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Best expert: |
2.36->2.52! |
Comments: |
nice high 3bv board... ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 09:09:50 PM |
|
Name: |
Arjádre |
Best expert: |
AR 74.35 on a 146 |
Best intermediate: |
AR 18.32 on a 41 |
Comments: |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 04:01:28 PM |
|
Name: |
Elmar |
Comments: |
I think they're working on it (at least I hope so). The problem is that arbiter doesn't store clicks to the history but has a f/nf tag instead. |
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 03:47:54 PM |
|
Name: |
Dennis Lütken |
Comments: |
I don't think anybody ever responded so I'll ask again... Is it possible to upload Arbiter history files to the clone rankings on Detrusor's site? ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 01:22:28 PM |
|
Name: |
bigG |
Comments: |
this is why: http://www.planet-minesweeper.com/misc/dmitriy_1.jpg |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 01:20:59 PM |
|
Name: |
bigG |
Comments: |
this is why: http://www.planet-minesweeper.com/misc/dmitriy_1.jpg |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 11:27:23 AM |
|
Name: |
Dmitriy |
Comments: |
Damien, i was always wondering WHY do you pay money for such type of guestbook when it is so easy to install a free php guestbook? there are tons of sources all over internet! ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 09:34:36 AM |
|
Name: |
damien |
Comments: |
@arjadre: yeah, if you fork out some money, bravenet lets you have 10,000 entries. the free version used to let you store old entries, but they got $ wise. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 08:30:38 AM |
|
Name: |
Rasmus H. Jensen |
Best expert: |
2,78 ----> 2,81 3BV/s |
Comments: |
75,01 on a 208 ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 08:05:48 AM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
Dennis you really have a lot of free time ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 02:56:50 AM |
|
Name: |
Dennis Lütken |
Best beginner: |
Clone: 1x2 --> 1x3! :-) |
Comments: |
I just got anoter 1-sec game on the clone. This time it was a nice 1.99 second game on a 3 3bv board, so I feel pretty lucky it wasn't 2.00! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 02:28:45 AM |
|
Name: |
Gergely |
Comments: |
@Areout: You got the wrong end: first, top20 players should come to build reputation and convince sponsors, then later, when there's marketing-value in a minesweeper tournament, players receive prices for their achievement. At the moment, I'm trying to convince sponsors and the best calling seems to be "best-ever top players" ![]() BTW, Rubik's idea was not immediately accepted; but having started from the same country as minesweeper tournaments ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 01:03:33 AM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
@Dmitriy: I simply cant resist, there is "hack me" written on it... |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 16th 2006 at 12:21:56 AM |
|
Name: |
WP |
Comments: |
Okay Arjadre, let's test this 2001st post :-P Schu: Gablastar already came up with the same idea on planete-demineur. But I don't like it 'cos I find that it's like taking an estimation for an unfinished game to count as one's record. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 08:50:15 PM |
|
Name: |
Arjádre |
Best intermediate: |
18x3=>18x4 (18.32 on a 41 this time) |
Comments: |
NF, of course, whopping 2.37 3bvs and 7.74 RQP. I had broken my RQP record earlier with a 20.18 on a 48 (NF), too... Okay, I might be wrong about this being the last entry (bravenet gbook pro now allows 10000 entries)... About 3bv limits...the penalty should be one sec per lacking 3bv (11 on a 25 becomes 16)...projecting the 3bv/s is not severe enough... ![]() I hope to break out of this syndrome soon... |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 07:40:39 PM |
|
Name: |
Andrew McCauley (Schu) |
Best expert: |
64 |
Best intermediate: |
15 |
Best beginner: |
2 |
Comments: |
I've been thinking again. As the first to be denied a record from the 3bv restrictions (or at least the first to post about it), and that 3bv being 29, only 1 from legal, I think low 3bvs should be counted, but in a different way: get the 3bv/s, and pretent the 3bv is 30, then get a time for that. Mine would have been 17, which I would have much preferred over my previous record of 19. Formula would be 1 + (time-1)*(3bvlimit)/3bv |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 06:33:38 PM |
|
Name: |
Dmitriy |
Comments: |
that is not bravenet but damien. did you see all those guestbook packages on the site? |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 05:59:45 PM |
|
Name: |
Arjádre |
Comments: |
This is the 1997th entry. After 2000, I believe bravenet begins a new guestbook...(remeoves all past entries from view)...you are warned. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 03:38:54 PM |
|
Name: |
Dmitriy |
Comments: |
@Daniel and other breakers: :)))))))) -- @Stevan: just stop cheating and i am sure your records would be accepted. @Robert: i feel sorry for you. |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 02:28:08 PM |
|
Name: |
Arjádre |
Comments: |
grrrr |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 02:20:06 PM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
congrats, DB :-) |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 02:14:57 PM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Best expert: |
75.14-->74.57 |
Comments: |
On a 138... not very well played, but it got the job done. ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 01:42:54 PM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
Yeah Gergely that is prob but if top20 sweepers would know they'll get at least 500 EUR each they would probably all be there... SO GO GET SOME SPONSORS YOU LAZY BUM ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 01:27:43 PM |
|
Name: |
Arjádre |
Comments: |
@Rasmus: ![]() @DB: grrr, I need some sub78s |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 01:20:17 PM |
|
Name: |
Rasmus H. Jensen |
Best expert: |
2,70 ----> 2,78 3BV/s |
Comments: |
Well I'm back ![]() ![]() ![]() Congratulations breakers ![]() ![]() Gregoire: Sent you an email regarding my records. Feels great sweeping again. A bit akward but surprisingly fast. Average 26 on int and 73 on exp + a new 3BV/s record. 68,93 on a 189 ![]() Keep up the sweep all... |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 12:45:24 PM |
|
Name: |
Gergely |
Comments: |
Hey, the community is on its way to reach a well-known status! ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 12:31:07 PM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
Hm, I think mines are played 10 times more than chess and rubik together, and chess champion gets one million I think ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 11:47:35 AM |
|
Name: |
damien |
Comments: |
several people talked about their rubik's cube records recently...the world record was just broken and they have international competitions. i don't see why something equally nerdy (minesweeper tournaments!) is not also capable of a major story in yahoo. here's the link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060115/ap_on_fe_st/rubik_s_world_record |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 11:28:16 AM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Comments: |
@Hopsing: I was just trying to give a somewhat balanced perspective on the options. As far as I'm concerned, he can try both and decide what he likes better! Personally I like clone. Others may think differently. That's the way it goes. |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 10:38:00 AM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
Thats true Robert, and as it is easily cheatable records on it arent accepted. ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 10:31:03 AM |
|
Name: |
Robert Benditz |
Comments: |
"Most people use the clone, others use arbiter (www.minesweeper-community.com/arbiter)." Arbiter is far from dominant, it's a useless program not worth anything. Neither is its programmer. |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 10:02:16 AM |
|
Name: |
Elmar |
Best expert: |
3bv/s: 3.61 |
Best intermediate: |
3bv/s: 4.38 -> 4.54 |
Best beginner: |
3bv/s: 6.12 |
Comments: |
A couple of minutes before that game I missed an estimated 4.75 on the last click. http://www.planete-demineur.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=11575#11575 http://www.planete-demineur.com/phpBB2/download.php?id=900 ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 09:10:36 AM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Comments: |
@Thomas: Records on the clone most definately count, and if anything count more than the original windows minesweeper because there are no cycles (so no dreamboard). Most people use the clone, others use arbiter (www.minesweeper-community.com/arbiter). Those are the two that are predominant as of right now. @Levente: I wouldn't mind a 19-73 ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 08:08:55 AM |
|
Name: |
Thomas Kolar |
Best expert: |
89 |
Best intermediate: |
30 |
Best beginner: |
5 (9*9) 6 (8*8) |
Comments: |
I just downloaded the clone. Thanks to those who made it! Its unbelievable! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 05:31:51 AM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
good, I leave for a day and my 74 still stands. :-) I'm revising my prediction, DBrim, to a 19/73 for you this AR, since you've suddenly decided to put up a lot of sub-80s. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 03:42:46 AM |
|
Name: |
Christoph |
Comments: |
@Arjádre: If one makes a mistake which causes an extra click, the board itself will not become fair. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 03:17:49 AM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Best expert: |
75-->75x2 |
Comments: |
I got 4 sub 80s today! 75, 76, 77, and 79... I also got 3 80s (including an 80.06) The 75 was on a 154 3bv (respectable)... also this brings my sub80 total to 7 ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 15th 2006 at 01:14:56 AM |
|
Name: |
JavaScriptStar ~ Play JavaScript Games |
Comments: |
Come play one of our games and add your link! We have everything from basic to advanced Javascript. We just added a webmaster area with real time stats. Have you ever wondered who has the most popular browser? How about the most popular screen resolution? We have all that information plus a lot more! Come see for yourself and be sure to bookmark our site. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 09:19:17 PM |
|
Name: |
Arjádre |
Best expert: |
2.33 3bv/s |
Best intermediate: |
2.94 |
Best beginner: |
3.69=>4.31 |
Comments: |
Sorry about overposting....7.26 on a 27 3BV board NF at 4.31 3bv/s, bringing total to 9.58 total 3bv/s. That's 2 ancient 3bvs records beaten in one day...feels pretty d*mn good... ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 05:25:12 PM |
|
Name: |
UPK (Arjádre) |
Comments: |
UPK is back! FOr now, the UPK contest will work as follows: sweepers can email "illegal" boards (3bv<30 int, <99 exp) that occur during regular gameplay (classic mode) to upkboards@yahoo.com. Boards will be made available after enough are received, and players will have two weeks to master them and submit their times to upktimes@yahoo.com. Finding int boards should be no problem as illegal ones occur around once every 5000 games. Exp might be harder. If none are received, I will use the cheat mode 3BV filter to find some. A question for the IMC: What happens when a 29 3bv int board is done in 30 3bv because of a misflag? Also: it would be nice to see 3bv/s added to the AR. Happy Sweeping! |
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 02:33:40 PM |
|
Name: |
Arjádre |
Best expert: |
2.24=>2.33 3bv/s |
Best intermediate: |
2.94 |
Best beginner: |
3.69 |
Comments: |
I thought I'd jump on the bandwagon and get a 3bv/s record... 89.07 on a 205 3bv board and 38.27 RQP...Total 3bv/s: 8.96 ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 12:00:28 PM |
|
Name: |
damien |
Comments: |
thanks roman for mentioning that. (i feel very old now...it felt like yesterday). |
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 08:35:51 AM |
|
Name: |
Roman Gammel |
Comments: |
Hello, sweepers! I'd like to remember you that exactly 5 years ago Lasse made first-ever-human-sub50 on expert. So today we celebrate sub50 day. Grats to all ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 07:44:46 AM |
|
Name: |
AreOut |
Comments: |
As it is not fair to get from 20->16 on such easy board we should set limit to 50 3bv ... ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 05:10:23 AM |
|
Name: |
manuel heider |
Comments: |
yesterday i tried to get better scores than 15-59 for AR but i couldnt, and today i play 30 minutes and now i have 14-58 that sucks ^^ |
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 05:01:08 AM |
|
Name: |
Andrew McCauley (Schu) |
Best expert: |
AR 66, NF 83->82 |
Best intermediate: |
NF 21-->20-->18 (best for AR) |
Comments: |
Wooohoo! The 20 and 82 I got at Goolwa on holiday, then the day I got back I got a t'riffic 18, 2.59 3bv/s! |
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 02:27:46 AM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Comments: |
DB: dang! Sounds like my 17 LC 50/50! That was the easiest board ever, except of course that one last problem. Here's hoping you crack sub-20 soon; you have a very good chance at it, I think my are of immediate improvement is still exp, where I feel like I can knock off another 2-3 seconds for this AR; so here's hoping I can get a 21/71 by which to beat your impending 17/75! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 02:06:18 AM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Best intermediate: |
20x4 |
Comments: |
I hit an absolutely fantastic board today. One very large opening with no difficult patters. I was NFing quickly, and there were 2 3bv left. Unfortunately, there was a 50/50 in the bottom left corner. I guessed incorrectly. The result? Estimated 16 after 32/34 |
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 01:24:12 AM |
|
Name: |
Dennis Lütken |
Comments: |
Dang, I guess I don't pay much attention to what day it is these days since I'm writing a small paper right now. Hmm, I couldn't have submitted anything REALLY nice for AR, but certainly something better than what I have now because of only half decent times and a time penalty! ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 01:20:16 AM |
|
Name: |
Ace |
Best expert: |
52 |
Best intermediate: |
14 |
Best beginner: |
1 |
Comments: |
@ Gab : You-hou! Enfin tu t'es décidé! ![]() Welcome here my friend, I hope we'll read some news from you soon! LOL ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 14th 2006 at 12:06:34 AM |
|
Name: |
Daniel Brim |
Comments: |
@Levente: I will continue to attack tomorrow when you're gone! Got a 2.34 3bv/s about 20 mins ago, hopefully will break that soon enough... was on a 187 3bv board. What I want is a nice 230 3bv board right now ![]() |
![]() |
|
Jan 13th 2006 at 09:43:18 PM |
|
Name: |
Levente |
Best expert: |
AR 74 |
Best intermediate: |
AR 21 |
Comments: |
DBrim, congrats on today's results... when I return from my trip (Sunday) we will reconvene this mad proliferation. My time, your 3bv/s, it's open season ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Viewing Page 33 of 53 (Total Entries: 5262) |