The Authoritative Minesweeper Guestbook

Feel free to chat, make suggestions, or tell your scores!

  First Page
  Prev Page
  Post
  Home
Next Page  
Last Page  
Viewing Page 6 of 36 (Total Entries: 3560)

Jan 30th 2004 at 03:25:53 AM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

Yeah, but with WinmineXP I don't see why that should still be allowed.....

Jan 30th 2004 at 02:27:22 AM
Name:  

David Barry

Comments:  

Stephan, background processes are allowed to slow the clock down (within reason). Soon after videos started being made, Lasse and I both realised that our clocks were losing 2/3 sec per minute. Marc Schouten was, I think, the only top player at the time to have the penalty of an accurate timer.

Jan 30th 2004 at 02:23:37 AM
Name:  

Stephan

Comments:  

Please read always carefully who is posting: we have Steffen (Stachna), Stevan (Gvozdenovic), Stephen (Arnason) and Stephan (Bechtel)!

Stevan, yes, i've watched the 44 and 51, not yet the 12. But in your last post, you admit that due to background processes, your minesweeper clock runs slower than normal. With a kind of abusing that bug for your own purposes, I don't really see the difference to cheating.

Jan 30th 2004 at 01:50:26 AM
Name:  

Rodrigo S. Camargo

Comments:  

Oh, I just forgot to give the site address explicitly:

http://www.geocities.com/minesweeperclone

Thanks again.

Website Website    
Jan 30th 2004 at 12:51:27 AM
Name:  

Roman Gammel

Comments:  

@Stephen: I saw a board with 3BV 92, but I did awful mistake and missed it.

Email Email         Website Website    
Jan 30th 2004 at 12:48:44 AM
Name:  

Dion

Comments:  

Errr, because that 41 is such an obvious fake its not funny. Does that mean your leaving forever? If so, hurrah!

Jan 30th 2004 at 12:17:54 AM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

Stephen have you seen my 44exp and 12int vids I posted here?!?

Why would someone who can do "real" 44 post "unreal" 41?!?

To throw "cheatingshadow" on himself?!?

Doh...

Just answer me that question, why would thief enter a house loudly if he can do it quiet?!?

And you know that mines timer is little slower, and my computer HDD (maybe) swapped in background cause of some surveillance programs (camera watching and so on)... so thats it, it sounds pretty unbelievable for many, so if you dont want accept it, no problem, I've said I can go and I WILL go sub40, sooner or later, see ya

Email Email        
Jan 29th 2004 at 09:45:05 PM
Name:  

Ryan Turk

Best expert:  

82

Best intermediate:  

20 -> 19!!

Best beginner:  

3

Comments:  

Finally!!!!!!!I finally got sub 20! and just in time for the active ranking...........it was on a 30 3BV board (I'm sure some of you guys could have done much better on this board)

Jan 29th 2004 at 08:11:48 PM
Name:  

Timothy Weerts

Comments:  

@Stephen: I'm pretty sure Dan Cerveny got his 44 on a 99 3bv board.

Jan 29th 2004 at 06:56:25 PM
Name:  

Rodrigo S. Camargo

Best expert:  

121

Best intermediate:  

30

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

Hi everybody.

I have been reading this site's guestbook for some time, and I could see all of your discussions about minesweeper.

I made a version of the game that is full of options and that has also a good game recorder/player. Everything I read in this guestbook encouraged me to put it on the Internet so that all could see it.

I would really appreciate if you could download, try it and give me your opinions about it. I will be making some corrections in the game as you all suggest anything you find necessary to be in it.

Thanks a lot by now.

P.S.: I know, my scores aren't really that good - I'm just a Minesweeper enthusiast.

Website Website    
Jan 29th 2004 at 06:54:18 PM
Name:  

Stephen

Best expert:  

66

Best intermediate:  

19

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

has anyone ever seen an expert board with a 3bv of less than a hundred? just now i saw a board that was a 104 3bv rating (darn it, didn't even have a chance on it i lost on the second click)

Jan 29th 2004 at 10:06:23 AM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

Damien, by Feb 2003 I was alreday down to at least 63 on expert.

Jan 29th 2004 at 10:03:05 AM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

Na, das macht doch nichts.....

Jan 29th 2004 at 09:03:12 AM
Name:  

Steffen Stachna

Comments:  

F***! Just missed a 50 on the last click

Jan 29th 2004 at 06:53:08 AM
Name:  

Stephan

Comments:  

@Roman: Good luck for finishing a 100 3BV board with a 3BV/sec ratio of more than 3... Would be a nice record.

@Stevan: I'll stop discussing. You can write whatever you want, but I won't believe it, and you won't accept my arguments. So, no further discussion about that.

Jan 29th 2004 at 06:13:11 AM
Name:  

Roman Gammel

Comments:  

I got my first sub70 game with 3BV/sec greater than 3,00. I finished board with 3BV 193 in 64,93 sec. 3BV/sec = 3,01.

http://gammel.pisem.net/301.txt

Email Email         Website Website    
Jan 28th 2004 at 07:59:05 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

Just finished Alptraum in 149,3s (24*36,180 mines) and Wahlsinn in 183,1s (30*40,250 mines) first tries of course

Email Email        
Jan 28th 2004 at 01:47:31 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

Stephan it's not maybe possible, it IS possible, and it was not mistake-free, far from that off course

Email Email        
Jan 28th 2004 at 12:38:23 PM
Name:  

Dan

Comments:  

Dave, I just sent the file to you.

Email Email         Website Website    
Jan 28th 2004 at 12:31:34 PM
Name:  

Active Ranking

Comments:  

**** Deadline Friday @ 20:00 GMT/ 3pm EST ****

Email Email         Website Website    
Jan 28th 2004 at 10:22:47 AM
Name:  

Dave Morgan

Comments:  

Can some1 email me their minesweeper program from winXP please? Send it to david.morgan@wadham.oxford.ac.uk

Email Email        
Jan 28th 2004 at 07:41:33 AM
Name:  

Claire

Best intermediate:  

79 - and i thought that was good!

Comments:  

Thank you so much for the tip about forever being stuck on the level of your last game! i was stuck with beginner which was no fun at all! Keep up the good work

Jan 28th 2004 at 07:24:56 AM
Name:  

Manu

Comments:  

Thanks everybody for your advice about mouses ( mice ? )
But It seems that just a little adjustement was necessary, as Sorin suggested...

Jan 28th 2004 at 07:15:35 AM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

WOOOOHOOOO, The Authoritative Minesweeper is back!

Jan 28th 2004 at 01:22:51 AM
Name:  

Stephan

Comments:  

For me, NF is the only possibility to play as I learned how to play fast NF, but didn't learn how to play double-clicking very efficient.

And Stevan, I still don't believe in your 7 cl/sec. Maybe it's possible to click with this speed, but definitively not to click mistake-free and thus solving 2/3 of a board.
Nice that you at least stopped to post your scores in front of each post. Thanks Elmar for mentioning this!

Jan 27th 2004 at 08:21:14 PM
Name:  

Willard

Comments:  

I'll take your advice. I know when I look at my orange cat and he is all squared up, I've been there too long.

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 08:13:41 PM
Name:  

Willard MacMillan

Comments:  

On 6-17-03 my last move to win on the expert was an 8. The time was 239. Not my best at that time, but to end it this way was strange.

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 07:59:02 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

And why not?!? You'll probably get better reflexes, memory, brightness, not overdo it tough(2-3 hours is enough, then get some rest)

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 07:57:16 PM
Name:  

Willard MacMillan

Best expert:  

170

Best intermediate:  

20

Best beginner:  

3

Comments:  

To sweep or not to sweep am I a question?

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 07:36:49 PM
Name:  

Stephen Arnason

Best expert:  

66

Best intermediate:  

19

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

well i just got an 84 on a 185 3bv board... not very impressive really until you realize that there is an 8 on it. i've never done an expert board with an eight and i am quite proud of this one. check

Jan 27th 2004 at 07:08:49 PM
Name:  

Matthew Ackerman

Best expert:  

58 -> 57

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

this is the first time i broke a record without peeking at the clock, i didn't even think i was doing that well

screenshot on my website, looks like another good AR for me...

Website Website    
Jan 27th 2004 at 07:00:21 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

You sound to me like a ski jumper

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 06:55:48 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

Marko are you Slovenian?!?

I dont know why people dont believe in such a fast clicking, Sorin has written he can do 12 clicks/s (for just a few seconds tough), and this is 7, and I looked video again ant there is no second where I clicked over 10!!!

Btw, just tied my int record

Soon or later I'll go faster than these 12

http://www.securityguardmn.com/12s.txt

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 05:47:19 PM
Name:  

Marko Jeznik

Comments:  

or faster...

Jan 27th 2004 at 04:10:42 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

And Elmar many time i'm nervous I go NF clockwise, clicking as fast as possible

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 04:08:54 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

Elmar I flagged almost 30% of time, luck wont follow anybody forever...and that 41 is not the best of me, I'm sure I can do sub40, question is only when

Btw I'm occupied with intermed. cause 10 or 11 is looking pretty possible for me, today missed est. 11 90% done

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 03:14:31 PM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

Says somebody who supposedly got a 41 non-flagging

Jan 27th 2004 at 02:44:03 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

Way to go Detrusor

Btw, guys whats the point in NF if you can surely do better with flagging

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 01:48:15 PM
Name:  

Detrusor

Best expert:  

73

Best intermediate:  

22 - > 20

Best beginner:  

3

Comments:  

Just wanted to say that i was so happy cause i broke my inter record... I made a 20 on a 52 3BV board (http://uselessfiles.free.fr/users/1/20_27.01.04_52.avi)

Tha sub20 is not yet, but i will keep on playing!

Email Email         Website Website    
Jan 27th 2004 at 10:47:12 AM
Name:  

Martin Toft Madsen

Comments:  

Stephan, I don't even think that I have played int yet this period, but of course I'm going to get an 11
I was just saying that I still get a sub60 once in a while

Btw, does the smileys also turn into links to the smiley images in the messages for you guys sometimes? It just happened when I previewed my message, and it has happened before

Email Email         Website Website    
Jan 27th 2004 at 10:18:17 AM
Name:  

Dave Morgan

Comments:  

I use a belkin optical mouse - 2 buttons and a wheel, its very small which some people might not like, and the cable isn't very long, but I've been using it for over a year and I like it

Email Email        
Jan 27th 2004 at 12:01:24 AM
Name:  

Stephan

Comments:  

@Dan: Keep going to play nf. You deserve it to get a nf sub-60

@Manu: I'm still using my nearly-broken Mitsumi Classic Mouse, but I can't recommend this mouse to anyone...

@Martin: Not bad, nf-56 is always nice. Right behind me for the AR? I have 14-52=66, so you must have an 11 in int?! Tell me if I missed some news... Or is that 56 only your second-best for the current period?

Jan 26th 2004 at 11:05:02 PM
Name:  

David Barry

Comments:  

Today I got a 19 on intermediate - my first NF sub-20, and my first sub-20 not on my home mouse. Unfortunately, my new home mouse is a Microsoft Optical that jumps around erratically at times, so I'm not going to be continuing these low scores (I think) once I stop having access to the uni computers (ie, the ones with minesweeper on, my account to which expires in a couple of weeks).

Jan 26th 2004 at 04:41:40 PM
Name:  

Dion

Comments:  

Microsoft Intellipoint works fine for me

Jan 26th 2004 at 04:30:17 PM
Name:  

Martin Toft Madsen

Comments:  

Just made my best score on my new computer: 56 sec on a 117 3BV... I guess I could have made at least a 53 on it if I wasn't so tired, but there were some nasty spots on the board, so I'm glad I finished it and now I at least got a good AR score
I'm right behind you, Stephan

Email Email         Website Website    
Jan 26th 2004 at 03:15:16 PM
Name:  

Gustaf Forsman

Comments:  

Manu: Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 3.0 --> The 1 and only

Email Email        
Jan 26th 2004 at 01:57:06 PM
Name:  

Sorin

Comments:  

What's wrong with your mouse Manu? I have the same model from about one year and 8 months. It still works fine...after I adjusted the buttons once (because plastic wears off in time )

Jan 26th 2004 at 01:04:32 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

I'm just proud cause of such scores Elmar

Email Email        
Jan 26th 2004 at 10:27:06 AM
Name:  

Martin Toft Madsen

Comments:  

Manu, I use a Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse, no optional buttons just a scroller and the two ordinary buttons, but I find the way it click really smooth and nice
I've used it for about 5-6 months now and so far it works fine

Email Email         Website Website    
Jan 26th 2004 at 09:39:20 AM
Name:  

Manu

Comments:  

I want to buy a new mouse. My "Optical logitech pilot wheel mouse" is now OOO. Any suggestion for a good one that I could use for longer than just 1 year ?

Jan 26th 2004 at 09:12:23 AM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

OK, that's another way to put it....

Jan 26th 2004 at 08:42:25 AM
Name:  

everybody

Comments:  

Stevan, shut the hell up, dude!

Jan 26th 2004 at 02:35:11 AM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

Stevan, do you really think it's necessary to post your scores with every 2-lign-message...?
Especially when every other post is from you.

Jan 25th 2004 at 07:21:55 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

15.03s 2.99 3bv/s not bad...

http://www.securityguardmn.com/15.txt

Email Email        
Jan 25th 2004 at 05:40:38 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

How do you mean?!?

No it's not a fake, look how many over 18 time I have there!!!

http://a.minesweeper.org/~diana/2004/

Email Email        
Jan 25th 2004 at 05:18:23 PM
Name:  

mr. bean

Comments:  

stephan your one is fake ha
it's a computer program

Jan 25th 2004 at 03:56:19 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

Huh, after many tries I 've overtaken you fishbone...

http://www.securityguardmn.com/14381.jpg

And I'll get blind if I continue playing this

Email Email        
Jan 25th 2004 at 03:35:52 PM
Name:  

Gustaf Forsman

Comments:  

Daniel: My webhost is being updated atm so I haven't had a chance to recive it, but I'll probably be able to get it tomorrow.

Jan 25th 2004 at 03:25:14 PM
Name:  

Dan

Best expert:  

44

Comments:  

I have been playing the last few days using the no-flaggging style. I just finished a 64, which I think is my personal no-flag record. I would like to get some sub60s.

Email Email         Website Website    
Jan 25th 2004 at 02:50:45 PM
Name:  

Stephan

Comments:  

Argh! Daniel, I wanted to have guestbook entry #3000, but as you got it now, I felt at least free to e-mail you concerning your videos...

Jan 25th 2004 at 02:35:29 PM
Name:  

Daniel Lynch

Comments:  

Sorry to intrude. Just wanted to re-offer my sub 80s experts and 17 inter to those interested at that level. Gustaf, did you get my email?

Email Email        
Jan 25th 2004 at 02:28:53 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

I've got some message below because I cant update scores now on that site :

Error java.net.malformed.Urlexception:no protocol: er.desy.de...

Somebody is probably with my IExplorer, but Java is turned on

Email Email        
Jan 25th 2004 at 02:11:50 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

No, but you probably havent noticed that both mouse buttons pressed will also flag a mine...pretty good done, but such a bad colors,shiiish

Email Email        
Jan 25th 2004 at 07:00:53 AM
Name:  

Elmar

Comments:  

How can you guys play with such horrible graphics?
I have trouble telling which squares are revealed and which are not....

Jan 25th 2004 at 05:39:34 AM
Name:  

FisH bONe (Michael Schmidt)

Best expert:  

66

Best intermediate:  

13

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

Stevan - Have you Screenshots, or better Video from your Score in minesweeper.org? ... I have a Video from the 18.277 sec. in Medium ([click on Homepage])

Website Website    
Jan 25th 2004 at 05:28:27 AM
Name:  

Dave Morgan

Comments:  

Does anyone know of any minesweeper games for linux that are close enough to (or the same as) the MS version that they'd be allowed for AR? Because having to change OS everytime I want to play 1)reduces how much I play, and 2) is really annoying. Not that I play much when I'm at uni, and I'm much slower on this computer than my one at home, but it'd still be nice

Email Email        
Jan 25th 2004 at 01:33:20 AM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

Btw Yoni or other guys what happend with Minesweeper Utopia project?!?

Email Email        
Jan 25th 2004 at 01:32:14 AM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

Because I have got low salary and cant afford to me Internet consumption on such a "unimportant" things like mines.

Btw, I play it (from time to time) since '92. or '93. there was some minesweeper for DOS as I remember, then on Win 3.11 and so on, of course I played for years before I went sub100 on expert...and why I am not on that list I dont have plenty of time for AR and I dont think its fair competition, because somebody can play 2-3 sessions and somebody whole 2 weeks, and for best-ever ask Georgi, and btw look at http://www.minesweeper.org/~diana/2003/ you'll find who is the best

Email Email        
Jan 25th 2004 at 12:33:19 AM
Name:  

Pyo

Best expert:  

78

Best intermediate:  

21

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

I wanna visit Lasse Nyholm's homepage.....
but his site has gine with the wind...oops....
I wanna go there......Help me.......

Jan 24th 2004 at 11:00:40 PM
Name:  

Stephen Arnason

Best expert:  

66

Best intermediate:  

19

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

@Stevan, i was just wondering why you seem to have the lowest total score and you're not in any of the AR, best ever, or any other minesweeper websites?

Jan 24th 2004 at 03:35:14 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

Mark, that's the way how two Germans did 9 on int. board, and such scores are accepted on best-ever list.

Email Email        
Jan 24th 2004 at 03:23:52 PM
Name:  

Georgi

Comments:  

Mark,
Forget about that ...

Jan 24th 2004 at 03:11:35 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

OK, Gustaf, but why just you?!?

Email Email        
Jan 24th 2004 at 02:48:23 PM
Name:  

mark

Comments:  

i havent been here in a while, but whats all this talk about dream boards and crap? i hear people talking about hitting f2 constantly to get dreamboard, watching videos of others playing a dreamboard to know what to do, where to click to find dreamboard... whats up with this crap?

Jan 24th 2004 at 12:34:33 PM
Name:  

Gustaf Forsman

Comments:  

Stevan: If u wanna challenge me again u know where u can find me. That game was really fun.
Nice 44 s on exp btw

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 11:33:44 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

Little fool wanna play multiplayer sweeper if you are that smart?!?

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 11:32:06 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

Dont look at this fool, he even wrote my name with little s

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 11:24:58 PM
Name:  

stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

i admit that i cheated and am sorry. i hope everyone can forgive me.

Jan 23rd 2004 at 05:30:40 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

And Dave it's the same like in Curtis version

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 05:29:37 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

Phew...after thousands of games finnaly I made something.

44 on 140 3bv board 3.18 3bv/s

http://www.securityguardmn.com/44-140.txt

I'll switch on intermediate now, I think I can finally beat these 12...

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 02:23:48 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

OK, but how he knew it was a dreamboard?!?

How he knew when to stop pressing F2?

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 01:41:03 PM
Name:  

Dave Morgan

Comments:  

Stevan - The minesweeper icon is not the same on all version of windows, so if your refering to Steffen's 9s video (he actually has an 8 second video too, as does Matthew Ackerman),then I'm pretty sure its just the win95 version of minesweeper, with an unusual colour scheme

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 01:31:51 PM
Name:  

Daniele

Comments:  

Ok, i solved it!!

Website Website    
Jan 23rd 2004 at 01:26:46 PM
Name:  

Daniele

Comments:  

I found a problem with the txt videos...i save them in Windows format...but the server of my site is UNIX...and it converts the files...uff...

Website Website    
Jan 23rd 2004 at 12:32:57 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Best expert:  

41

Best intermediate:  

12

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

Dan so why it is accepted on best-ever?!?

Georgi told me that Steffen and Roland were pressing F2 continously to find that board, and it's cheat of course, whats more in his vid you can see its done on some kind of other Minesweeper (Icon is same as on Curtis version) so continously pressing F2 would be much stupid thing if you can load/save board

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 12:14:32 PM
Name:  

Dan

Best expert:  

44

Best intermediate:  

11

Comments:  

The congress did take a poll about the 9 second intermediate games and although no official word ever came out of it, I closed the poll several months ago after the vote was 6 to 0 in favor of NOT recognizing those games.

I am one of the old timers here and I think everybody trusts me. I stopped recording videos of my games a long time ago. If I was to get lucky and play a 41 expert game on a very low 3BV board, I would guess just a screenshot would be enough proof for most people here who have been around awhile and know me. With that in mind, I doubt I'll ever break my record again.

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 09:19:44 AM
Name:  

Lance

Comments:  

I worry that with all of the clones and alternate versions of Minesweeper that are out there, people will get the mistaken impression that those scores are accepted as valid for either the Active Ranking or for the best-ever or world records list. They are not. Only scores that are achieved playing the Microsoft Minesweeper game are accepted as legitimate, at least for the AR, and I suspect for Georgi's Best-Ever list and Damien's World Record lists. Please be very careful when playing not to confuse the variations for the original! Happy sweeping!

Lance

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 08:52:27 AM
Name:  

Tim

Comments:  

Nevermind, I found the explanation. Cool site. Wish I had found it years ago!

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 08:47:52 AM
Name:  

Tim

Best expert:  

95

Best intermediate:  

31

Best beginner:  

4

Comments:  

Hi, this is the first time I've visited this site. What is all the "3bv" lingo about?

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 07:23:05 AM
Name:  

Dennis Lütken

Best expert:  

68

Best intermediate:  

13

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

I just messed up again!
With only four squares left (all of them in one corner) on a 138 3bv board I messed up at 63 because I marked a square that was OBVIOUSLY NOT a mine!

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 05:48:43 AM
Name:  

Dennis Lütken

Comments:  

Just wanted to say that I just realised by watching the video of the missed 112 3bv board that I had played NF apart from the first two mines I marked so I tried to play the whole board using NF style in Curtis' version... On my first try (the second total on Curtis' version) I got a 57 because the rest of the board was so easy! Chances are that I would have played it NF if I hadn't messed up because I hardly ever change back once I've changed to NF for a little while on expert! Man, I just missed the chance of a sub-60!!!

Jan 23rd 2004 at 05:38:43 AM
Name:  

Dennis Lütken

Best expert:  

68

Best intermediate:  

13

Best beginner:  

1

Comments:  

I just messed up a 112 3bv board!!!
I had solved 43 out of the 112 and got an estimated time of 56! I know I wouldn't have gotten a 56 but I might have gotten a really nice score! I messed up on a guess in the corner! I played it on Curtis' version and made the right guess in the corner. On my first try I finished the board and got a nice 63! That certainly would have been a nice outcom even if it wasn't the 56 it was estimated to... For some reason my head feels a little like...

Email Email        
Jan 23rd 2004 at 04:44:31 AM
Name:  

Dennis Lütken

Comments:  

DB = Dreamboard!

Jan 23rd 2004 at 04:19:55 AM
Name:  

Dion

Comments:  

DB?

Jan 23rd 2004 at 02:55:03 AM
Name:  

David Barry

Comments:  

Yesterday I got a 20 on int on one of the uni computers. My best expert with that mouse is 74, so if I'd had a good mouse... I couldn't save a screenshot (well, not easily), but a quick manual count gave a 3BV in the high 30's. I have, I think, deep down believed that the whole no-flagging business was a fad that would pass, but now having tried it, you do actually solve int boards quickly.

Jan 23rd 2004 at 01:55:37 AM
Name:  

Dave Morgan

Comments:  

I thought it'd been decided that whilst previous records would be allowed, new DB scores wouldn't be counted, is that right?

(If not then I'm very annoyed at the one DB I got and screwed up a while ago )

Jan 22nd 2004 at 11:56:47 PM
Name:  

Georgi

Comments:  

Stephen,

The address is kermekchiev@hotmail.com

Jan 22nd 2004 at 11:08:55 PM
Name:  

Dion

Comments:  

Man, ive screwed up 3 dreamboards in my career of minesweeper, and its the easiest board ever.

Jan 22nd 2004 at 05:02:02 PM
Name:  

Stephen

Best expert:  

73 --> 66!!!

Best intermediate:  

19

Best beginner:  

2

Comments:  

just beat my expert record by a very considerable amount of time. on a 166 3bv board, 2.51 3bv/s which is quite a solid rate. also i got a 27 on an 83 3bv/s with a 3.23 3bv/s, my highest rate of this ever. @anyone who knows... what is the email address i send to to get on the best ever list? thanks

Jan 22nd 2004 at 03:33:55 PM
Name:  

Stevan

Comments:  

Just asking, when I was at 72 I think I was around 15-16 on int. Maybe it's cause of my flagging style.



  First Page
  Prev Page
  Post
  Home
Next Page  
Last Page  
Viewing Page 6 of 36 (Total Entries: 3560)

powered by Powered by Bravenet bravenet.com